Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-19
Status Closed
Type Miscellaneous|Ota Other
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hurst, Richard
Defendant Hurst, Arthur

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Complaint filed.
  2. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 433412 Date: 08/19/2022
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 433412 Date: 08/19/2022
  5. Land Court summons Receipt: 433412 Date: 08/19/2022
  6. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server, filed and ALLOWED. Counsel mailed copy. Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R.
  8. Appearance of Alan S Fanger, Esq. for Richard Hurst Co-Trustee of the Hurst Living Trust, filed
  9. The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Alan S Fanger, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 08/30/2022 11:09:05
  10. Event Scheduled Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 10/07/2022 Time: 02:30 PM Counsel notified vie email.
  11. Answer and Counterclaim of Arthur Hurst Co-Trustee of the Hurst Living Trust filed
  12. Defendant's Case Management Conference Memorandum, filed.
  13. Plaintiff's Case Management Conference Memorandum, filed.
  14. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 10/07/2022 02:30 PM Has been:Case management conference and early intervention event held via videoconference. Attorney Alan Fanger appeared on behalf of plaintiff, with Richard Hurst present, and Attorney Andrew Lawlor appeared on behalf of defendant, with Arthur Hurst present. Court is in receipt of Defendant's Case Management Conference Memorandum and Plaintiff's Case Management Conference Memorandum. By way of background, counsel advised that title to the property at issue, 166 South Main Street, Natick, is held by the Hurst Living Trust, with the Plaintiff and Defendant as the sole beneficiaries. The parties now disagree as to the valuation of the property and how best to sell, because Plaintiff seeks to purchase the property while Defendant prefers to market the property for sale to a third party. Given that this matter involves administration of a trust, court discussed with counsel whether the Land Court has jurisdiction under G.L. c. 185, § 1(k), or whether the case would be more properly heard in Probate Court. Court then inquired into the possibility of settlement or mediation in order to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution, and counsel jointly advised that they would be open to mediation. Following colloquy, court to issue a Mediation Screening Order. By November 7, 2022, parties to complete mediation screening. By November 14, 2022, parties to submit written joint report to the court as to outcome of the mediation screening, whether parties are willing to attend mediation, and if so, naming mediation provider, identity of neutral, and date of session. Status conference scheduled for December 8, 2022, at 10:00 A.M., with court to further discuss jurisdiction at such time. Hon. Diane R. Rubin, Presiding Counsel notified via email.
  15. Order Referring Case to Dispute Resolution Screening Session, issued. (Copies emailed to Attorneys Alan Fanger and Andrew Lawlor) Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R.
  16. Scheduled Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R. Event: Status Conference Date: 12/08/2022 Time: 10:00 AM
  17. ADR Report of REBA: Parties have a Mandatory Screening on November 3, 2022.
  18. ADR Report of REBA: Parties have a Mediation on December 13, 2022 with Judge Sands.
  19. Joint Stipulation, filed.
  20. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 12/08/2022 10:00 AM Has been: Rescheduled to January 5, 2023 at 2:30 pm. Counsel has a mediation scheduled. Hon. Diane R. Rubin, Presiding
  21. Scheduled Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R. Event: Status Conference Date: 01/05/2023 Time: 02:30 PM Counsel notified via email.
  22. ADR Report of REBA: Parties Mediated on December 13, 2022 with Judge Sands and the case settled.
  23. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 01/05/2023 02:30 PM Has been: Canceled. Counsel reported this case settled. Court to issue a 30-day Nisi Order. Hon. Diane R. Rubin, Presiding
  24. Day Nisi Order issued. Returnable 02/08/2023. (Copies emailed to Attorneys Alan Fanger and Andrew Lawlor)
  25. Order of Dismissal, issued. (Copies emailed to Attorneys Alan Fanger and Andrew Lawlor) Judge: Rubin, Hon. Diane R.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.