Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Complaint electronically filed.
- Civil action cover sheet filed.
- Plaintiff Predictsoft, Llc's Motion for Appointment as Process Server
- Endorsement on Motion to Appoint Special Process Server (#3.0): ALLOWED (dated 6/22/22) notices sent 6/27/22
- General correspondence regarding NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE INTO BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION "BLS2" This matter has been accepted into the Suffolk Business Litigation Session. It has been assigned to BLS2. Dated: June 17, 2022 Notice sent 7/5/22 (See P#4 for complete notice)
- Notice of 93A complaint sent to Attorney General
- Endorsement on Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server (#3.0): ALLOWED (dated 7/11/22) notice sent 7/12/22
- Service Returned for all defendants, accepted by counsel Applies To: Boston Meridian, Llc (Defendant); Siracuse, John (Defendant); Raby, John C. (Defendant); Palm, Garrett (Defendant)
- Attorney appearance On this date Thomas T Reith, III, Esq. added for Defendant Boston Meridian, Llc
- Attorney appearance On this date Michael Deiulis, Esq. added for Defendant Boston Meridian, Llc
- Attorney appearance On this date Thomas T Reith, III, Esq. added for Defendant John Siracuse
- Attorney appearance On this date Michael Deiulis, Esq. added for Defendant John Siracuse
- Attorney appearance On this date Thomas T Reith, III, Esq. added for Defendant John C. Raby
- Attorney appearance On this date Michael Deiulis, Esq. added for Defendant John C. Raby
- Attorney appearance On this date Thomas T Reith, III, Esq. added for Defendant Garrett Palm
- Attorney appearance On this date Michael Deiulis, Esq. added for Defendant Garrett Palm
- Party(s) file Stipulation Applies To: Predictsoft, Llc (Plaintiff); Boston Meridian, Llc (Defendant); Siracuse, John (Defendant); Raby, John C. (Defendant); Palm, Garrett (Defendant)
- Defendants Boston Meridian, Llc, John Siracuse, John C. Raby, Garrett Palm's Notice of intent to file Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Massachusetts Superior Court Rule 9E
- Defendant Boston Meridian, Llc, John Siracuse, John C. Raby, Garrett Palm's Motion to Dismiss
- Boston Meridian, Llc, John Siracuse, John C. Raby, Garrett Palm's Memorandum in support of Defendants' Combined Motion to Dismiss
- Opposition to Defendants' Combined Motion to Dismiss filed by Predictsoft, Llc
- Defendants Boston Meridian, Llc, John Siracuse, John C. Raby, Garrett Palm's Notice of Filing
- Defendants Boston Meridian, Llc, John Siracuse, John C. Raby, Garrett Palm's Submission of Superior Court Rule 9A List of Documents Filed
- Reply/Sur-reply Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Their Combined Motion to Dismiss
- The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 09/16/2022 10:54:28
- The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 12/02/2022 13:27:49
- Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 12/06/2022 02:00 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. Michael D Ricciuti, Presiding Staff: Beatriz E Van Meek, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
- Matter taken under advisement: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 03/16/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Hon. Kenneth W Salinger, Presiding Staff: Beatriz E Van Meek, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
- Endorsement on Motion to dismiss (#8.0): Other action taken ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See Decision and Order. (Dated 5/2/2023) Notice sent via email 5/2/2023
- ORDER: Decision and Order on Defendants' Motion to dismiss See page #12 Order: Defendants' Motion to dismiss is ALLOWED IN PART with respect to the fraud claims in counts II and IX of the complaint and the promissory estoppel claim against the induvial defendants in count VIII. The motion is DENIED IN PART with respect to the seven other claims asserted in Plaintiffs' complaint. (Dated 5/2/2023) Notice sent via email 5/2/2023
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In