Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-08
Status CLOSED
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 63 entries
Disposition voluntary dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Forte, Carmen
Defendant Collins, Steven Walter|Ards Cricket Ranch Inc
Photo of Hon. Olin Melissa G

Judge

Hon. Olin Melissa G

Columbia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case 122022CA000067CAAXMX Filed with Clerk on 3/8/2022
  2. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  3. MEDIATION DISPOSITION REPORT
  4. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
  5. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COPIES
  6. REQUEST FOR COPIES
  7. NOTE TO DOCKET: PER THE GENERAL ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES NO. 2023-10; EFFECTIVE 07/01/23 CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE OLIN
  8. Judge: OLIN , MELISSA G Assigned
  9. DEFENDANTS' CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE AND AUTHORITY
  10. NOTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE
  11. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW
  12. DEFENDANTS AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COPIES
  13. ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASES DUE TO THE RETIREMENT OF JUDGE PAUL S. BRYAN ON DECEMBER 31, 2022
  14. Judge: DOUGLAS , WESLEY R Assigned
  15. DEFENDANTS' SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  16. DEFENDANT'S CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL OF NON-OBJECTION
  17. DEFENDANTS' FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  18. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTIES
  19. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COPIES
  20. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  21. DEFENDANT STEVEN COLLINS' VERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES
  22. DEFENDANT'S VERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES
  23. 2ND AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION
  24. AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
  25. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO PLAINTIFF CARMEN FORTE
  26. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT
  27. NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  28. DEFENDANT'S CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL OF NON-OBJECTION
  29. NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
  30. REQUEST FOR COPIES
  31. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTIES
  32. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS' MEDICARE INTERROGATORIES
  33. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS' INTERROGATORIES
  34. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION (SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT)
  35. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  36. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO SOCIAL MEDIA REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  37. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  38. DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  39. DEFENDANTS', STEVEN WALTER COLLINS AND ARDS CRICKET RANCH, INC. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  40. NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF PRIMARY ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS FOR SERVICE
  41. DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  42. DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF FOR DOWNLOAD OF SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT
  43. NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORIES #1-29 TO PLAINTIFF
  44. NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOUNDING MEDICARE INTERROGATORIES #1-3 TO PLAINTIFF
  45. DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  46. DEFENDANTS' SOCIAL MEDIA REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  47. RETURNED MAIL -STEVEN WALTER COLLINS
  48. CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WITH ATTACHED PLAN AND PROCEDURES
  49. RETURN OF SERVICE- ARDS CRICKET RANCH, INC. SERVED 04/29/22 (INDV)
  50. RETURN OF SERVICE- STEVEN WALTER COLLINS SERVED 04/28/22 (SUB-DOUG WILLIAMS, CO-RESIDENT)
  51. Judge: BRYAN , PAUL S Assigned
  52. Payment received: $420.00 Receipt Number CC 204511
  53. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $420.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  54. NOTICE OF FILING THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STANDING ORDER IN CIVIL CASES
  55. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ARDS CRICKET RANCH, INC.
  56. SUMMONS ISSUED TO STEVEN WALTER COLLINS
  57. REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANTS
  58. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS
  59. CERTIFICATE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT DEWEY E. ARDS CRICKET RANCH #2
  60. CERTIFICATE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT STEVEN WALTER COLLINS
  61. COMPLAINT
  62. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  63. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $420.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more