Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-13
Status CLOSED
Type Other Trust Litigation
Docket 41 entries
Disposition transfer

Parties

Plaintiff Dennard, Charlotte
Defendant Murphy, Vernon B | Vernon Murphy As Successor Tru
Photo of Hon. Feagle Mark

Judge

Hon. Feagle Mark

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionRECEIPT OF TRANSFER
  2. DescriptionCOVER LETTER TO CLERK
  3. DescriptionNOTE TO DOCKET: CASE TRANSFER MAILED TO LEE COUNTY IN THE SELF-ADDRESSED FED EX ENVELOPE PROVIDED
  4. DescriptionCOVER LETTER TO CLERK
  5. DescriptionCase Status set to CLOSED
  6. DescriptionORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE VENUE
  7. DescriptionNOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  8. DescriptionPLAINTIFF'S AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF CANDI HAGGARD VIA ZOOM
  9. DescriptionPLAINTIFF'S AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT VIA ZOOM
  10. PLAINTIFF'S THIRD NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS
  11. JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE VENUE
  12. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF CINDI HAGGARD VIA ZOOM
  13. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT VIA ZOOM
  14. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION
  15. DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  16. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  17. RECEIPT FROM DAILY PAYMENTS
  18. Payment received: $17.00 Receipt Number CC 234555
  19. Assessment 2 Total Assessed $17.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  20. Assessment 2 assessed at sum $17.00
  21. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUEST
  22. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS
  23. PLAINTIFF'S SECOND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE SUBPOENA
  24. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM VIA ZOOM OF ROBERT P. HENDERSON, ESQ.
  25. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT VIA ZOOM
  26. NOTICE OF FILING PROOF OF SERVICE (SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM W/O DEPOSITION)
  27. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
  28. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TO CHANGE VENUE
  29. NOTE TO DOCKET: CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE FEAGLE DUE TO STANDING ORDER OF RECUSAL BETWEEN JUDGE DOUGLAS AND THE DOUGLAS AND DOUGLAS LAW FIRM
  30. Judge: FEAGLE , MARK E Assigned
  31. CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WITH ATTACHED PLAN AND PROCEDURES
  32. RETURN OF SERVICE- VERNON MURPHY ON 04/21/23 (INDV)
  33. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS
  34. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
  35. Judge: DOUGLAS , WESLEY R Assigned
  36. Payment received: $410.00 Receipt Number CC 229757
  37. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $410.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  38. SUMMONS ISSUED TO VERNON B. MURPHY
  39. COMPLAINT
  40. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  41. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $410.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more