Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Napa County Superior

Court

Napa County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-11
Status Inactive
Type Petition Re:arbitration Award Unlimited (11)
Docket 120 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Nordby Construction Company
Photo of Hon. Smith, Cynthia P

Judge

Hon. Smith, Cynthia P

Napa County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Memorandum of Costs
  2. Comment Petition (Unlimited) (Fee Applies)
  3. 07/11/2023 Notice of Hearing
  4. 09/06/2023 Proof of Service: Summons DLR (Civil)
  5. 09/26/2023 Petition Hearing Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard Comment Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
  6. 09/26/2023 Minute Order
  7. 10/10/2023 Order Comment ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO CONFIRM CONTRACTUAL ARBITRATION AWARD
  8. 10/23/2023 Judgment Comment JUDGMENT AFTER GRANTING PETITION TO CONFIRM CONTRACTUAL ARBITRATION AWARD
  9. 10/24/2023 Abstract of Judgment: Issued
  10. 10/25/2023 Application and Order for Appearance and Examination Comment Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  11. 11/15/2023 Writ (Issued) Comment County of: Sacramento
  12. 12/01/2023 Application and Order for Appearance and Examination Comment Amended-received
  13. 12/29/2023 Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service
  14. 01/11/2024 Order of Examination Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  15. 01/11/2024 Minute Order
  16. 03/05/2024 Application and Order for Appearance and Examination Comment Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  17. 04/18/2024 Order of Examination Judicial Officer Young, Scott R.L. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  18. 04/18/2024 Application and Order for Appearance and Examination Comment Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  19. 04/18/2024 Minute Order
  20. 04/29/2024 Proof of Service
  21. 05/03/2024 Order of Examination Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion: Hearing
  22. 05/03/2024 Minute Order
  23. 05/03/2024 Notice Comment Notice of Continued Hearing on Debtor's Examination
  24. 05/21/2024 Order of Examination Original Type Order of Examination Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  25. 05/21/2024 Minute Order
  26. 06/06/2024 Writ (Issued) Comment County of: Napa
  27. 06/11/2024 Writ (Filed) Comment Writ (Filed)
  28. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  29. Result Heard
  30. Minute Order
  31. Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  32. Comment Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  33. Order of Examination
  34. Judicial Officer Young, Scott R.L.
  35. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  36. Result Heard
  37. Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  38. Comment Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  39. Minute Order
  40. Proof of Service
  41. Order of Examination
  42. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  43. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  44. Result Continued Party's Motion: Hearing
  45. Minute Order
  46. Notice
  47. Comment Notice of Continued Hearing on Debtor's Examination
  48. Order of Examination
  49. Original Type Order of Examination
  50. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  51. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  52. Result Heard
  53. Minute Order
  54. Writ (Issued)
  55. Comment County of: Napa
  56. Writ (Filed)
  57. Comment Writ (Filed)
  58. Writ (Issued)
  59. Comment County of Napa
  60. Application: Ex Parte (Fee Applies)
  61. Comment PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SINGORELLO WINERY S WINE
  62. Declaration
  63. Comment DECLARATION OF BENJAMIN D. KOEGEL IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SINGORELLO WINERY S WINE
  64. Exparte Application
  65. Original Type Exparte Application
  66. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  67. Hearing Time 11:30 AM
  68. Result Heard
  69. Comment FOR PRIVATE PLACE ORDER SO NSO CAN SERVE WRIT ON 3RD PARTY'S PROPERTY
  70. Minute Order
  71. Motion
  72. Comment MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SINGORELLO WINERY S WINE
  73. Declaration
  74. Comment DECLARATION OF BENJAMIN D. KOEGEL IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SINGORELLO WINERY S WINE
  75. Opposition or Objections
  76. Comment OPPOSITION OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCA TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  77. Opposition or Objections
  78. Comment OBJECTION OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCA'S AND AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA'S TO DECLARATION OF BENJAMIN D. KOEGEL IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  79. Declaration
  80. Comment DECLARATION OF THOMAS G. MOUZES IN SUPPORT OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCA'S AND AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA???S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  81. Exhibit List (Party)
  82. Comment LIST OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCA'S AND AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA'S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  83. Declaration
  84. Comment DECLARATION OF JACOB BINGHAM IN SUPPORT OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCA'S AND AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA'S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  85. Opposition or Objections
  86. Comment OPPOSITION OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  87. Opposition or Objections
  88. Comment Opposition to Nordby Motion for a private place order permitting Sheriff to enter private property
  89. Declaration
  90. Comment DECLARATION OF ALISON ROADES- BROWN IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTYTO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  91. Declaration
  92. Comment AMENDED DECLARATION OF JACOB BINGHAM IN SUPPORT OF AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCAS AND AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA???S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER NORDBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY???S MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED BOTTLES OF RESPONDENT SIGNORELLO WINERY???S WINE
  93. Notice
  94. Comment Notice of Withdrawal of (8/29/24) Motion
  95. Motion
  96. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  97. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  98. Cancel Reason Vacated
  99. Comment MOTION FOR A PRIVATE PLACE ORDER PERMITTING SHERIFF TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY TO SEIZE THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDREDBOTTLES OF RESPONDENTS INGORELLO WINERY'S WINE
  100. Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  101. Comment ISSUED
  102. Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  103. Comment FILED
  104. Application and Order for Appearance and Examination
  105. Comment AMENDED ISSUED
  106. Proof of Service
  107. Comment Re: Amended OEX
  108. Order of Examination
  109. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  110. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  111. Result Heard
  112. Comment AS TO RAY SIGNORELLO, OWNER OF SIGNORELLO WINERY
  113. Minute Order
  114. Order of Examination
  115. Original Type Order of Examination
  116. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  117. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  118. Result Heard
  119. Writ (Issued)
  120. Comment County of: Sacramento

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more