Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-28
Type Ap Tran By Order Post Opinion
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Yount, Shawn W.
Defendant State Of Missouri

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Marshal's Return MARSHAL FILED RETURN HAVING SERVED A COPY OF THE COURT ORDER ON THE MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
  3. Case Disp- Opin & Mandate Sent CERTIFIED COPY OF OPINION AND MANDATE SENT TO THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK OF CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY. CERTIFIED COPY OF MANDATE HAND DELIVERED TO THE MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT. CERTIFIED COPY OF MANDATE DELIVERED TO THE MARSHAL OF THIS COURT. OPINION RELEASE SHEET E-MAILED TO THOMSON REUTERS.
  4. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  5. Dissenting Opinion Author of Opinion - George W.Draper III
  6. Opinion Reversed & Remanded VOTE: WILSON, C.J., RUSSELL, BRECKENRIDGE, FISCHER AND RANSOM, JJ, CONCUR; DRAPER, J., DISSENTS IN SEPARATE OPINION FILED. MOTIONS FOR REHEARING MUST BE FILED WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM THIS DATE (RULE 84.17). THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 44.01(E) DO NOT APPLY TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR REHEARING.
  7. Signed Majority Opinion Author of Opinion - Robin Ransom
  8. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  9. Case Submitted ARGUED AND SUBMITTED. Scheduled For: 02/01/2022; SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI; 4; SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
  10. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  11. Substitute Reply Brief Appellants Substitute Reply Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: KATHARINE PATRICIA CURRY On Behalf Of: SHAWN W. YOUNT
  12. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  13. Substitute Respondent's Brief Respondents Substitute Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SHAUN J. MACKELPRANG On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Case Docketed CAUSE DOCKETED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON FEBRUARY 1, 2022 AT 10:30 A.M. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCKET LETTER, DOCKET AND NOTICE TO COUNSEL. COUNSEL ARGUING BEFORE THE COURT MUST SIGN IN WITH A DEPUTY CLERK NO LATER THAN 10:15 A.M.
  16. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  17. Sustained ORDER ISSUED: RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT'S BRIEF SUSTAINED. SAID BRIEF IS NOW DUE ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 11, 2022. Associated Entries: 12/28/2021 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  18. Mot Ext Time to File Brief Motion for Extension of Time; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SHAUN J. MACKELPRANG On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI Associated Entries: 12/28/2021 - Sustained +
  19. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  20. Entry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance and Withdrawal of Counsel; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SHAUN J. MACKELPRANG On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI
  21. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  22. Sustained ORDER ISSUED: RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE ITS SUBSTITUTE BRIEF SUSTAINED. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 30, 2021. Associated Entries: 11/10/2021 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  23. Mot Ext Time to File Brief Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: EVAN JOSEPH BUCHHEIM On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI Associated Entries: 11/10/2021 - Sustained +
  24. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  25. Substitute Appellant's Brief Appellants Substitute Brief; Appellants Substitute Brief Appendix; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: KATHARINE PATRICIA CURRY On Behalf Of: SHAWN W. YOUNT
  26. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  27. Sustained ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF SUSTAINED. APPELLANT'S BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 8, 2021. Associated Entries: 10/18/2021 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  28. Mot Ext Time to File Brief Brief Extension Motion; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: KATHARINE PATRICIA CURRY On Behalf Of: SHAWN W. YOUNT Associated Entries: 10/18/2021 - Sustained +
  29. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  30. No Filing Fee Due
  31. Record on Appeal Transferred CLERK, MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS, EASTERN DISTRICT, TRANSFERRED THE ENTIRE FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF SAID COURT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2021. THE FILE CONSISTS OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL, RECORD ON APPEAL (LEGAL FILE AND TRANSCRIPT), APPELLANT'S BRIEF, RESPONDENT'S BRIEF, APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF, AND CASE RELATED DOCUMENTS. ***COUNSEL OF RECORD MAY WISH TO REVIEW RULE 83.08.***

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more