Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-26
Type Ap Petition For Review
Docket 39 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Director Of Reenue
Defendant Carfax, Inc.|Iles, Carole Lewis|Ford, Benjamin Andrew|Rose, B. Derek

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Case Disp- Opin & Mandate Sent CERTIFIED COPY OF OPINION AND MANDATE MAILED TO THE MISSOURI ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING COMMISSION IN JEFFERSON CITY, MO. OPINION RELEASE SHEET EMAILED TO THOMSON REUTERS.
  3. Overruled RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING AND TO MODIFY DECISION OVERRULED. Associated Entries: 10/11/2022 - Motion for Rehearing +
  4. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  5. Motion for Rehearing Motion for Rehearing and to Modify Decision; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CAROLE LEWIS ILES On Behalf Of: CARFAX, INC. Associated Entries: 11/01/2022 - Overruled +
  6. Entry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CAROLE LEWIS ILES On Behalf Of: CARFAX, INC.
  7. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  8. Sustained ORDER ISSUED: RESPONDENT'S CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING SUSTAINED. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING IS DUE ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 12, 2022. ANY FURTHER EXTENSIONS WOULD NOT BE VIEWED FAVORABLY WITH THE COURT. Associated Entries: 09/26/2022 - Motion for Extension of Time +
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. Motion for Extension of Time Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: BENJAMIN ANDREW FORD On Behalf Of: CARFAX, INC. Associated Entries: 09/27/2022 - Sustained +
  11. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  12. Other Opinion VACATED & REMANDED VOTE: ALL CONCUR. MOTIONS FOR REHEARING MUST BE FILED WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM THIS DATE (RULE 84.17). THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 44.01(E) DO NOT APPLY TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR REHEARING.
  13. Signed Majority Opinion Author of Opinion - Paul C. Wilson
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Case Submitted ARGUED AND SUBMITTED. Scheduled For: 05/11/2022; SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI; 2; SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
  16. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  17. Appellant's Reply Brief Appellants Reply Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: MICHAEL EVERETT TALENT On Behalf Of: DIRECTOR OF REVENUE
  18. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  19. Case Docketed CAUSE DOCKETED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON MAY 11, 2022 AT 9:00 A.M. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCKET LETTER, DOCKET AND NOTICE TO COUNSEL. COUNSEL ARGUING BEFORE THE COURT MUST SIGN IN WITH THE DEPUTY CLERK IN THE COURTROOM NO LATER THAN 8:45 A.M.
  20. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  21. Sustained ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF SUSTAINED. APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE APRIL 11, 2022.
  22. Mot Ext Time File Reply Brf Motion for Extension of Time ot File Reply Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: MICHAEL EVERETT TALENT On Behalf Of: DIRECTOR OF REVENUE
  23. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  24. Respondent's Brief Respondents Brief; Appendix Part 1 to Respondents Brief; Appendix Part 2 to Respondents Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CAROLE LEWIS ILES On Behalf Of: CARFAX, INC.
  25. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  26. Appellant's Brief Brief of Appellant; Appendix of Appellant; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: MICHAEL EVERETT TALENT On Behalf Of: DIRECTOR OF REVENUE
  27. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  28. Sustained Until ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF SUSTAINED. APPELLANT'S BRIEF IS NOW DUE ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 16, 2022. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION WILL NOT BE VIEWED WITH FAVOR. Associated Entries: 01/28/2022 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  29. Mot Ext Time to File Brief Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: MICHAEL EVERETT TALENT On Behalf Of: DIRECTOR OF REVENUE Associated Entries: 01/28/2022 - Sustained Until +
  30. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  31. Sustained ORDER ISSUED: APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF SUSTAINED. APPELLANT'S BRIEF IS DUE ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 2, 2022. Associated Entries: 12/22/2021 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  32. Mot Ext Time to File Brief Appellants Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: MICHAEL EVERETT TALENT On Behalf Of: DIRECTOR OF REVENUE Associated Entries: 12/22/2021 - Sustained +
  33. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  34. Certfctn of/and Record Filed Certification of the Record of Proceedings Before the Administrative Hearing Commission and Record Filed; Legal File; Transcript; Pet ex 1; Pet ex 2; Pet ex 3; Pet ex 4; Pet ex 5; Pet ex 6; Pet ex 7; Pet ex 8; Pet ex 9; Pet ex 10; Pet ex 11; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service; Pet ex 12; Pet ex 13; Resp ex A; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. THE RECORD HAVING BEEN FILED, THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE HAS BEEN ACTIVATED. COUNSEL OF RECORD MAY WISH TO REVIEW RULE 84.05.
  35. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  36. Correspondence Sent PETITION FOR REVIEW ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER SENT.
  37. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  38. No Filing Fee Due
  39. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: MICHAEL EVERETT TALENT On Behalf Of: DIRECTOR OF REVENUE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more