Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-20
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (3 An)|Intentional Tort (for Example: Assault, Battery, Vandalism)
Docket 14 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Horace, Lillian
Defendant Midas Alaska
Photo of Hon. Guidi, Andrew

Judge

Hon. Guidi, Andrew

Anchorage Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Initial Judicial Assignment: Honorable Andrew Guidi
  2. Complaint for Intentional Tort
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Civil Rule 4(f) Affidavit
  5. Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees: Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Horace, Lillian Case Motion #1
  6. Amended Complaint Lillian Horace (Plaintiff);
  7. Order Granting Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees Horace, Lillian Case Motion #1 Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees:
  8. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: The court has received three proposed summons for parties that have not been included in the case caption on the complaint for this case. If you wish to have summons issued for these parties, you must file an amended complaint that includes the new parties names in the case caption. Additionally, along with your proposed summons, the court has received a mostly blank copy of service instructions titled to a “Brandon Ray Jackson”. It is unclear what the intent of this document is. If you wish to have your summons delivered to the intended parties by a process server, you may do so once the summons have been issued and sent to you. If you choose to utilize a process server, you must use a process server who has been licensed by the State of Alaska. You may find further instructions regarding Civil Rule 4 service, and how to properly serve a summons and complaint by searching for “CIV-106”, which can be found in the “Civil – Forms” section of the court’s website. Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 04/03/2023 11:50:45.85
  9. Amended Complaint Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Lillian Horace (Plaintiff);
  10. Summons Issued
  11. Affidavit of Service by Certified Mail (Copy of Postal Receipt) Lillian Horace (Plaintiff);
  12. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Your recently filed Affidavit by Certified Mail does not indicate what was served, and it also lacks the seal and signature of a notary. Please note that if a Summons and Complaint was served, these documents must be served via Certified Mail Restricted Delivery, and a signed green card must be provided to prove service has been completed. Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 05/17/2023 11:29:10.65
  13. Notice of Failure to Serve Defendant(s) Notice of Dismissal for Failure to Serve Defendant Sent on: 07/20/2023 09:47:09.00
  14. Order of Dismissal as to the Defendant(s) named below: Order of Dismissal for Failure to Serve Defendant Sent on: 08/31/2023 14:06:25.25

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.