Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-24
Type Breach Of Warranty
Docket 82 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Thompson, Robert
Defendant American Honda Motor Co. Inc
Photo of Hon. ALISON E MCCARTY

Judge

Hon. ALISON E MCCARTY

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Regular Mail Service - Mailed TIMOTHY ABEEL
  2. Regular Mail Service - Mailed ROBERT THOMPSON
  3. Regular Mail Service - Mailed RICHARD P GABELMAN
  4. Regular Mail Service - Mailed LINDSAY MARICE UPTON
  5. Regular Mail Service - Mailed AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC
  6. THE COURT ORDERS THIS MATTER TO BE MARKED ''SETTLED AND DISMISSED''. WITH COSTS TO THE PLAINTIFF. AEM
  7. NOTICE ISSUED ABEEL, TIMOTHY
  8. NOTICE ISSUED THOMPSON, ROBERT
  9. NOTICE ISSUED GABELMAN, RICHARD P
  10. NOTICE ISSUED UPTON, LINDSAY MARICE
  11. NOTICE ISSUED AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC
  12. FINAL PRETRIAL ON MAY 10, 2024. DUE TO THE CONTINUATION OF TRIAL, THE FINAL PRETRIAL DATE HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL JUNE 24, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M., IN-PERSON. AEM
  13. THE COURT UPON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL. UPON AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE TRIAL DATE HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL JULY 25, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. AEM
  14. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  15. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY RICHARD GABELMAN AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, ROBERT THOMAS
  16. PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING, THE COURT HEREBY DENIES DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE OR LIMIT THE UNRELIABLE TESTIMONY OF JACKIE WINTERS. FURTHER, THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SPECIFICALLY, THE COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS IT RELATES TO PLAINTIFF'S IMPLIED WARRANT CLAIMS UNDER THE MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANT ACT AND THE OHIO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AS WELL AS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER THE OHIO CONSUMER SALES PRACTICES ACT. THE COURT DENIES DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS IT RELATES TO PLAINTIFF'S OHIO LEMON LAW CLAIMS. PLAINTIFF'S EXPRESS WARRANT CLAIMS UNDER THE MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANT ACT AND THE OHIO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER IMPLIED WARRANT IN TORT. AM
  17. THIS MATTER WAS PREVIOUSLY SET FOR FINAL PRETRIAL ON APRIL 29, 2024. UPON PLAINTIFF'S ORAL REQUEST AND WITH AGREEMENT OF DEFENSE, THE FINAL PRETRIAL DATE HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 10, 2024 AT 10:30 A.M. IN -PERSON. AM
  18. DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  19. PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  20. NOTICE OF FILING VIDEO (CD) OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF JACKIE WINTERS *CD IN SAFE ROOM*
  21. 2024-03-01 - LETTER TO CLERK - EXHIBITS F AND G
  22. EXHIBIT F TO MOTION IN LIMINE
  23. EXHIBIT G TO MOTION IN LIMINE
  24. DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE OR LIMIT THE UNRELIABLE TESTIMONY OF JACKIE WINTERS
  25. EXHIBIT A
  26. EXHIBIT B
  27. EXHIBIT C
  28. EXHIBIT D
  29. EXHIBIT E
  30. EXHIBIT E, PART 7
  31. EXHIBIT E, PART 8
  32. EXHIBIT E, PART 9
  33. EXHIBIT F
  34. EXHIBIT G
  35. EXHIBIT E, PART 2
  36. EXHIBIT E, PART 3
  37. EXHIBIT E, PART 4
  38. EXHIBIT E, PART 5
  39. EXHIBIT E, PART 6
  40. EXHIBIT E, PART 1
  41. EXHIBIT D
  42. EXHIBIT D-1
  43. EXHIBIT C-1
  44. EXHIBIT C-2
  45. EXHIBIT C-3
  46. EXHIBIT C-4
  47. EXHIBIT C-5
  48. EXHIBIT C-6
  49. DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  50. EXHIBIT TO
  51. EXHIBIT TO
  52. EXHIBIT TO
  53. NOTICE OF FILING OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF ROBERT THOMPSON VOLUME II(EXHIBITS)
  54. NOTICE OF FILING OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF ROBERT THOMPSON VOLUME I (TRANSCRIPT)
  55. NOTICE OF FILING OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF JACKIE WINTERS VOLUME I (TRANSCRIPT)
  56. NOTICE OF FILING OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF JACKIE WINTERS VOLUME II (EXHIBITS)
  57. NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY MATTHEW S MARSALKA AS COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF ROBERT THOMPSON
  58. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS BY MARCH 1, 2024. ALL RESPONSES/REPLIES SHALL BE FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 6. AEM
  59. AMENDED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF JACKIE WINTERS
  60. TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE ON JANUARY 9, 2024. THE TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL JANUARY 11, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. AEM
  61. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 9, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. AEM
  62. THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REDUCE EXPERT FEES FILED NOVEMBER 8, 2023, ALONG WITH ALL ASSOCIATED BRIEFING THEREAFTER, IS MOOT. AEM
  63. AMENDED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF JACKIE WINTERS
  64. NOTICE OF 30(B)(5) DEPOSITION
  65. AMENDED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF JACKIE WINTERS
  66. MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REDUCE EXPERT FEES OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR REPLY
  67. TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 28, 2023 AT 12:30 P.M. THE PARTIES SHALL PARTICIPATE IN THE TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE BY CALLING THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE LINE. AEM
  68. REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REDUCE EXPERT FEES
  69. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REDUCE EXPERT FEES
  70. MOTION TO REDUCE EXPERT FEES
  71. THE COURT MAY AWARD ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS TO THE PREVAILING PARTY ON THE MOTION PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 37(B)(1). AEM
  72. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE. TRIAL DATE: MAY 20, 2024 AT 8:30 A.M. FINAL PRETRIAL DATE: APRIL 29, 2024 AT 10:30 A.M., IN-PERSON. DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY DECEMBER 8, 2023. AEM
  73. DISCOVERY PLAN
  74. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY MATTHEW MARSALKA AS CO-COUNSEL FOR TIMOTHY J ABEEL JR
  75. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED OF A FIRST PRETRIAL CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE ON MAY 11, 2023 AT 9:30 A.M. THE PARTIES SHALL PARTICIPATE IN THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE BY CALLING THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE LINE. AEM
  76. This Case was transferred from JUDGE: ROWLANDS, MARY MARGARET to JUDGE: MCCARTY, ALISON Reason: User Reassignment
  77. TERMINATION/TRANSFER FROM JUDGE MARY MARGARET ROWLANDS TO JUDGE ALISON MCCARTY. REASON: RECUSAL KM MMR ACM
  78. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  79. DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S ANSWER
  80. Certified Mail Service - Served AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC
  81. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC
  82. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more