Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-31
Type Dissolution Of Marriage
Docket 54 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bakeraubrey
Defendant Bakerbrian
Photo of Hon. Thomas Linda S

Judge

Hon. Thomas Linda S

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. (SM)
  3. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  4. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND (WITH ATTORNEY)
  5. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  6. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  9. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  10. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  11. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  12. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  13. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  14. SUMMONS AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION,
  15. ISSUED (RET'D TO ATTY)
  16. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER (SM)
  17. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE & WAIVER (SM)
  18. ORDER (8/18/23 @ 9:00AM)(SM)
  19. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WITHDRAWAL OF WAIVER (T JANER
  20. FOR RESP)(SM)
  21. MOTION TO CONTINUE AND FOR REASSIGNMENT (SM)
  22. RECUSAL AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT (SM)
  23. ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT (L THOMAS) (SM)
  24. CM:THOMAS-PETIT PRESENT W/ATTY C MIZE-RESP PRESENT
  25. W/ATTY T JANER. MATTER COMES ON FOR APPLICATION FOR
  26. TEMPORARY ORDER. ATTY C MIZE TO PREPARE TEMPORARY
  27. ORDER - JOINT CUSTODY ON TEMPORARY BASIS, BUSINESSES TO
  28. CONTINUE TO RUN AS USUAL, INCOME TO BE EXCHANGED FOR
  29. CHILD SUPPORT. ATTY T JANER TO PREPARE ORDER FOR
  30. MEDIATION - MEDIATION TO BE DONE W/IN 60 DAYS. PARTIES
  31. ORDERED BACK 9-7-23 @ 1:30 PM FOR CONTROL DATE. (TB)
  32. COURT MINUTE (TB)
  33. CM:THOMAS-MIZE-JANER-MATTER IS PASSED BY AGREEMENT TO
  34. 9-21-23 @ 1:30 PM. (TB)
  35. ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION (9/21/23 @ 1:30PM)(SM)
  36. CM:THOMAS BY BAILIFF HARPER-HEARING SET 9/21/23 @ 1:30
  37. PM IS CONTINUED BY THE COURT TO 10/26/23 @ 1:30PM (JS)
  38. COURT MINUTE FILED (JS)
  39. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER AND
  40. ORDER PERMITTING SAME (SM)
  41. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND CROSS-PETITION (SM)
  42. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR
  43. TEMPORARY ORDER AND RESPONDENTS APPLICATION FOR
  44. TEMPORARY ORDER (SM)
  45. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (SM)
  46. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND
  47. ORDER RESETTING STATUS CONFERENCE (12/7/23 @
  48. 1:30PM)(SM)
  49. PETITIONER'S OBJECTION AND ANSWER TO RESPONDENT'S
  50. CROSS-PETITION (SM)
  51. CM:THOMAS BY BAILIFF C ROBISON-HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER
  52. 7, 2023 IS STRICKEN BY AGREEMENT. (TB)
  53. COURT MINUTE FILED (TB)
  54. JOINT DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (KC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more