Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-04
Status Open
Type Torts|Malpractice Medical
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sparks, Jeffery
Defendant Aspire Health Alliance|Aspire Health

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Attorney appearance On this date Pro Se added for Plaintiff Jeffery Sparks
  2. Case assigned to: DCM Track A - Average was added on 01/04/2023
  3. Original civil complaint filed.
  4. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  5. Affidavit of Indigency and request for waiver substitution of state payment of fees and costs filed without Supplemental affidavit
  6. Docket Note: Affidavit fee is incorrect as it says $240
  7. Determination regarding normal fees and costs REFFERRED TO A JUDGE, ALLOWED by judge waived in full , pursuant to G. L. c. 261, § 27C(2). The entry fee and surcharge fee; the cost of the summons are all waived. The cost of service of process shall be paid by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Leighton, J)(dated; 1/6/23) certified copy sent pl Judge: Leighton, Hon. Joseph
  8. Docket Note: 1 summons mailed to the plaintiff
  9. One Trial case reviewed by Clerk, case to remain in the Superior Court. Judge: Hickey, Mary K
  10. Financial Note: Superior Court Civil Entry Fee in the amount of $280.00 waived on 1/30/2023; See Determination by Judge Leighton dated 1/23/2023 (P# 4.0)
  11. Service Returned for Defendant Aspire Health: Service made in hand; to Jeanette Wan, Manager, person in charge at time of service at 460 Quincy Avenue, Quincy 02169 on 3/20/23
  12. Party status: Defendant Aspire Health: Inactive;
  13. Clarification / Correction of the docket: Corrected Defendant's name from Aspire Health to Aspire Health Alliance to reflect original complaint as it was initially entered wrong in error
  14. Attorney appearance On this date Christopher Gerard Perillo, Esq. added as Private Counsel for Defendant Aspire Health Alliance (efiled 4/6/23) mc
  15. Defendant Aspire Health Alliance's Notice of intent to File Motion to Dismiss by (South Shore Mental Health Center Inc dba Aspire Health Alliance) (E-Filed) pl
  16. Defendant Aspire Health Alliance's Motion to dismiss all counts (e-Filed) dg
  17. Aspire Health Alliance's Memorandum in support of it's Motion to Dismiss (e-Filed) dg
  18. Affidavit of 9C from Christopher G. Perillo, Esq. (e-Filed) dg
  19. Affidavit of Compliance pursuant to Rule 9A (e-Filed) dg
  20. Defendant Aspire Health Alliance's Submission of Notice of filing (e-Filed) dg
  21. Defendant Aspire Health Alliance's Submission of List of Documents (e-Filed) dg
  22. Defendant Aspire Health Alliance's Request for Hearing (e-Filed) dg
  23. Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 05/30/2023 02:30 PM Has been: Held via Video/Phone Comments: Zoom; FTR room 10 -start time of 2:36:33 Hon. Joseph Leighton, Presiding
  24. Endorsement on Motion to dismiss After hearing at which plaintiff did not appear after notice, The Motion is (#7.0): ALLOWED without opposition as follows: the case is DISMISSED without prejudice because plaintiff failed to comply with the notice provision of MGL c. 231, s. 60L(a). (dated 5/30/2023) ns ni

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more