Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Westmoreland County

Court

Westmoreland County

Pennsylvania

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-31
Status S. D.
Type Quo Warranto
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Defendant Walter Geiger
Photo of Hon. HARRY F SMAIL

Judge

Hon. HARRY F SMAIL

Westmoreland County (PA)

Pennsylvania

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. *COMPLAINT QUO WARRANTO/
  2. NOTICE SENT TO ALL COUNSEL & UNREPRESENTED PARTIES/PER PA RA
  3. ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1925(A)
  4. CONCISE STATEMENT OF MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL
  5. ORDER APPELLATE RULE 1925B NOTICE GIVEN RULE N236
  6. AMENDED
  7. NOTICE APPEAL FROM THE COMMONWEALTH COURT
  8. *NOTICE APPEAL TO THE COMMONWEALTH COURT
  9. *ORDER SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED
  10. RESPONSE - DEFENDANT'S
  11. ORDER ORAL ARGUMENT
  12. MOT/PET SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  13. Confidential Document Form
  14. APPEARANCE ENTERED BY
  15. REQUEST ADMISSIONS
  16. ANSWER COMPLAINT
  17. APPEARANCE ENTERED BY
  18. SHERIFF'S RETURN
  19. SHERIFF'S RETURN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more