Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Palm Beach Co

Court

Palm Beach Co

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-05
Status Reopen
Type Anti Trust Trade Regulation
Docket 84 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Reed, Adrian
Defendant New York Tribeca Group,
Photo of Hon. Curley G Joseph

Judge

Hon. Curley G Joseph

Palm Beach County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ~~CORRECT AND RESUBMIT SUMMONS NOT ISSUED PLEASE FOLLOW CORRECT FORMATTING FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED DEFENDANTS NAME MUST BE LISTED AND THE ADDRESS FOR SERVICE AFTER
  4. APPL AND AFF OF INDIGENCY
  5. DIVISION ASSIGNMENT
  6. COMPLAINT
  7. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION NON PARTY
  8. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION NON PARTY
  9. MOTION FOR DEFAULT
  10. NOTICE OF DEFAULT NOT ENTERED
  11. MOTION FOR DEFAULT
  12. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  13. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  14. SUMMONS ISSUED
  15. MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT
  16. NOTICE OF DEFAULT NOT ENTERED
  17. NOTICE OF DEFAULT NOT ENTERED
  18. DCM DESIGNATION TO THE GENERAL TRACK WITH JURY TRIAL ORDER
  19. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  20. MOTION FOR DEFAULT
  21. E-FILED DUPLICATE FILING
  22. PROPOSED UNSIGNED ORDER
  23. MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT
  24. SERVICE RETURNED (NUMBERED)
  25. OTICE OF DEFAULT NOT ENTERED
  26. ERVICE RETURNED (NUMBERED)
  27. OTION FOR DEFAULT
  28. -FILED DUPLICATE FILING
  29. LERK'S DEFAULT
  30. OTICE OF HEARING
  31. FFIDAVIT
  32. FFIDAVIT
  33. RDER OF DEFAULT
  34. EFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT BOOK 34821 PAGE 1156-1157
  35. ISPOSED BY DEFAULT
  36. OTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  37. OTION MOTION FOR HEARING ON UNLIQUIDATED DAMAGES
  38. AID $10.00 ON RECEIPT 5257153
  39. OTICE OF HEARING
  40. OTION FOR RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR MONEY JUDGMENT - F/B PLT ADRIAN REED PRO SE
  41. OTICE OPPOSITION TO OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR HEARING AND MOTION FOR RELIEF FILED BY DFT
  42. EMORANDUM OF LAW
  43. ESPONSE TO: TO OPPOSITION TO OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR HEARING AND MOTION FOR RELIEF F/B PLT PRO SE
  44. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  45. OTION TO COMPEL
  46. INAL JUDGMENT BOOK 35205 PAGE 767-768
  47. OTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  48. OTION DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT AND DEFAULT
  49. OTION DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT AND DEFAULT
  50. OTICE OF ORDER SERVED F.B PLT
  51. NISSUED WRIT
  52. RDER SETTING HEARING
  53. ESPONSE TO: OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT AND DEFAULT. PLAINTIFF ASSERTS THE DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT AND DEFAULT MUST BE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE F/B PLT PRO SE
  54. OTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF INTERLOCUTORY RULING F/B PLT PRO SE
  55. RDER VACATING BOOK 35433 PAGE 1978-1979
  56. OTION FOR RELIEF FROM AN ORDER FILED BY PLT
  57. OTICE SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF INTERLOCUTORY RULING FILED BY PLT
  58. DDITIONAL COMMENTS
  59. RDER DENYING KASTRENAKES; PLTF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED DTD 12/9/2024
  60. OTION FOR A HEARING F/B PLT PRO SE
  61. EMAND
  62. OTION TO COMPEL
  63. RDER OF RECUSAL/REASSIGNMENT
  64. IVISION ASSIGNMENT
  65. OTICE OF REASSIGNMENT CIVIL
  66. OTICE OF HEARING
  67. RDER SETTING HEARING
  68. RDER J. CURLEY DTD 2/27/25: REQUIRING TRIAL ON DAMAGES AFTER DEFAULT AND ORDER GRANTING ORE TENUS MOT AMEND TO ADD DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. **SEE ORD FOR DETAILS**
  69. RDER SETTING JURY TRIAL
  70. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  71. OTICE OF FILING INTERROGS
  72. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  73. OURT REPORTER APPEARANCE
  74. OURT REPORTER APPEARANCE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more