Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rashad Adkins|Regis Adkins
Defendant Michael Moss|Eileen Eucker
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(56229404) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: IAN R. LUSCHIN [email protected]
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(56229403) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: IAN R. LUSCHIN [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(56229402) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LEONARD EHRENREICH [email protected]
  5. TIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT ENTRY. O.S.J. COURT COST ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. EFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO EHRENREICH & ASSOCIATES
  7. TIPULATION FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) MICHAEL MOSS(D1) and EILEEN EUCKER(D2) ATTORNEY IAN R. LUSCHIN 0079349 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
  8. OTION FILED FOR DEFENDANT(S) MICHAEL MOSS(D1) and EILEEN EUCKER(D2) IAN R. LUSCHIN 0079349 JOINT MOTION FOR NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRY OF DISMISSAL TO REPLACE THE COURT'S JUDGMENT ENTRY DATED AUGUST 9, 2024
  9. UDGMENT ENTRY(54520190) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL EHRENREICH [email protected]
  10. UDGMENT ENTRY(54520189) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: IAN R. LUSCHIN [email protected]
  11. UDGMENT ENTRY(54520188) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: IAN R. LUSCHIN [email protected]
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(54520187) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LEONARD EHRENREICH [email protected]
  13. UDGMENT ENTRY(54520186) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LEONARD EHRENREICH [email protected]
  14. HE COURT NOTES THAT THE PLAINTIFF FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD ON 10/17/2023 AND HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ANY OF THE ORDERS ESTABLISHED AT THAT CONFERENCE, INCLUDING FAILING TO TIMELY FILE A TRIAL BRIEF AND FAILING TO SUBMIT JURY INSTRUCTIONS. THEREFORE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 10/17/2023. PLAINTIFF DID NOT APPEAR. THE FOLLOWING DATES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE AS SET FORTH IN THE TRIAL ORDER, APPLY: 1. PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE EXPERT REPORTS BY NOT LATER THAN 1/19/2024. 2. DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE EXPERT REPORTS BY NOT LATER THAN 3/18/2024. 3. ALL DISCOVERY IS TO BE COMPLETED BY NOT LATER THAN 3/18/2024. 4. TRIAL IS SCHEDULED FOR 8/12/2024 AT 8:00 A.M. 5. TRIAL ORDER ENTERED. O.S.J. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. RIAL SET FOR 08/12/2024 AT 08:00 AM.
  17. ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/17/2023 AT 10:30 A.M. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. DO NOT CALL THE COURT. DATES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUANCE UNLESS A MOTION HAS BEEN DOCKETED AND HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. NSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) MICHAEL MOSS(D1) and EILEEN EUCKER(D2) ATTORNEY IAN R. LUSCHIN 0079349 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS MICHAEL MOSS AND EILEEN EUCKER
  19. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED DEFENDANT(S) MICHAEL MOSS(D1) and EILEEN EUCKER(D2) IAN R. LUSCHIN 0079349. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
  20. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51044624 RETURNED BY U.S. MAIL DEPARTMENT 07/11/2023 EUCKER/EILEEN/ MAIL RECEIVED AT ADDRESS 07/19/2023 TENDERED TO AGENT FOR FINAL DELIVERY
  21. SPS RECEIPT NO. 51044623 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/13/2023 MOSS/MICHAEL/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/19/2023.
  22. UMS COMPLAINT(51044624) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: EILEEN EUCKER 4498 W 152ND ST CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  23. UMS COMPLAINT(51044623) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MICHAEL MOSS 4498 W 152ND ST CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  24. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  25. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  26. RIT FEE
  27. RIT FEE
  28. UDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  29. EGAL RESEARCH
  30. EGAL NEWS
  31. EGAL AID
  32. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  33. OMPUTER FEE
  34. LERK'S FEE
  35. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID LEONARD EHRENREICH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more