Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 2 years
- Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 5 years
- Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 4(i)
- Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure 4183701 IAFC
- Civil Complaint - $2500.01 to $5,000.00 COMPLAINT $2887.47
- Civil Summons Issued (Efiling)
- Answer Answer
- Affidavit of Service aos
- Disclosure of Documents and Witnesses Pursuant to JCRCP 16.1 Plaintiff's Initial Disclosure of Witnesses and Documents Pursuant to JCRCP 16.1
- Motion for Summary Judgment Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
- Motion Motion to compel arbitration and to extend time for Defendant to file an opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment
- Opposition Plaintiff's Limited Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
- Stipulation and Order Stipulation and Order to Continue Hearing
- Reply Defendants reply in support of his motion to compel arbitration
- Civil Motion (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officers Pro Tempore, Judge, Stoberski, Holly S.) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment & Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Extend Time to file an Opposition 09/22/2022 Reset by Court to 10/20/2022 Result: Matter Heard
- Notice Status Report
- Opposition Plaintiff's Objection To Defendant's Status Report Regarding Arbitration Between Discover Bank and Maiyumi Yuma
- CANCELED Civil Motion (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officers Pro Tempore, Judge, Stoberski, Holly S.) Vacated Continued - Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Extend Time to File an Opposition
- Administrative Reassignment to Department 1 Case reassigned from Department 6 (Judge Rebecca Kern)
- Motion Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
- Civil Motion (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Graham, Elana Lee) Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Result: Matter Heard
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In