Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Waterbury County

Court

Waterbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-11
Type T 20 Torts Products Liability Other Than Vehicular
Docket 96 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kasandra Walsh|Hannah Lamb|Kyenna Hamilton|Crystal Stewart|Loretta Ferris|Shantail Thomas|Megan Rehahn|Angela Blahnik|Melissa Watters|Stephanie Mendez|Sara Vankampen
Defendant Coopersurgical, Inc.|Cooper Companies, Inc.|Femcare, Ltd. Uk Subsidiary Of Utah Medical Products, Inc.|Utah Medical Products, Inc.

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE
  6. APPEARANCE
  7. APPEARANCE Appearance
  8. RETURN OF SERVICE
  9. RETURN OF SERVICE
  10. AMENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS
  11. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN on defendant, Cooper Companies, Inc.
  12. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN on defendant, Femcare, Ltd-UK Subsidiary of Utah Medical Products, Inc.
  13. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN on Utah Medical Products, Inc.
  14. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 RESULT: Order 5/30/2023 HON THEODORE TYMA
  15. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/30/2023 HON THEODORE TYMA
  16. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 RESULT: Order 5/30/2023 HON THEODORE TYMA
  17. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/30/2023 HON THEODORE TYMA
  18. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 RESULT: Granted 7/19/2024 HON W PIERSON
  19. ORDER RESULT: Order 2/22/2024 HON W PIERSON
  20. ORDER granted - see order RESULT: Granted 7/19/2024 HON W PIERSON
  21. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  22. COMPLEX LITIGATION APPLICATION (JD-CV-39) RESULT: Granted 7/5/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  23. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/5/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  24. OBJECTION TO TRANSFER TO COMPLEX LITIGATION RESULT: Overruled 7/5/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  25. ORDER RESULT: Overruled 7/5/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  26. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN
  27. REPLY Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Objection to Transfer to the Complex Litigation Docket
  28. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  29. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  30. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-31
  31. ORDER General Case Management Order RESULT: Order 7/24/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  32. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF?S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS RESULT: Granted 8/28/2023 HON W PIERSON
  33. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/28/2023 HON W PIERSON
  34. ORDER Transfer to X10 order RESULT: Order 8/9/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  35. ORDER General Case Management Order RESULT: Order 9/6/2023 HON W PIERSON
  36. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE BRIEF LONGER THAN PERMITTED BY RULE PB 4-6 RESULT: Granted 9/8/2023 HON W PIERSON
  37. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/8/2023 HON W PIERSON
  38. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  39. REPLY MEMORANDUM
  40. REPLY MEMORANDUM AMENDED
  41. ORDER consolidation order RESULT: Order 10/13/2023 HON W PIERSON
  42. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 2/20/2024 HON W PIERSON
  43. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/20/2024 HON W PIERSON
  44. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  45. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Pls Supplemental Memo in Opposition to Defs' MTD
  46. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  47. REPLY MEMORANDUM REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MO. TO DISMISS
  48. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  49. EPLY MEMORANDUM REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MO. TO DISMISS
  50. OTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAL
  51. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 8/14/2024 HON W PIERSON
  52. RDER to 9/17/2024 RESULT: Granted 8/14/2024 HON W PIERSON
  53. BJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Overruled 8/14/2024 HON W PIERSON
  54. RDER RESULT: Overruled 8/14/2024 HON W PIERSON
  55. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  56. RDER RE: FILING SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 8/14/2024 HON W PIERSON
  57. CHEDULING ORDER Joint Scheduling Order RESULT: Accepted 8/23/2024 HON W PIERSON
  58. RDER RESULT: Accepted 8/23/2024 HON W PIERSON
  59. RDER Notice- revised request for adjudication form RESULT: Order 8/29/2024 HON W PIERSON
  60. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Order 9/17/2024 HON W PIERSON
  61. RDER GRANTED, through September 27, 2024. RESULT: Order 9/17/2024 HON W PIERSON
  62. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  63. EQUEST TO REVISE
  64. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Order 1/2/2025 HON W PIERSON
  65. RDER RESULT: Order 1/2/2025 HON W PIERSON
  66. OTICE of service of I & P and RFP on Def
  67. OTICE of service of Requests for Admission on Def.
  68. NSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a)
  69. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) RE: REQUEST TO REVISE AND OBJECTION
  70. MENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint
  71. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 RESULT: Granted 2/18/2025 HON W PIERSON
  72. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/18/2025 HON W PIERSON
  73. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  74. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
  75. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/20/2025 HON W PIERSON
  76. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  77. EQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT/AMENDMENT
  78. MENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint and Second Amended Complaint indicating changes
  79. OTION TO STRIKE RESULT: Off 5/14/2025 HON W PIERSON
  80. RDER RESULT: Off 6/23/2025 HON W PIERSON
  81. RDER 6/23/25 hearing is off RESULT: Off 6/23/2025 HON W PIERSON
  82. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE
  83. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Pls. Memo in Opposition to Def. MTS Pls. second amended Complaint.
  84. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO PLTFS OBJECTION -#155.00 RESULT: Granted 5/5/2025 HON W PIERSON
  85. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/5/2025 HON W PIERSON
  86. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  87. EPLY MEMORANDUM TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
  88. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) MOTION TO STRIKE
  89. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 6/3/2025 HON W PIERSON
  90. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/3/2025 HON W PIERSON
  91. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  92. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 -to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production
  93. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 RESULT: Granted 7/17/2025 HON W PIERSON
  94. RDER PHV M. McCormick RESULT: Granted 7/17/2025 HON W PIERSON
  95. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  96. EQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT/AMENDMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more