Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-24
Status Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal General Juvenile
Docket 25 entries
Disposition GRANTS the motion

Docket Entries

  1. Appeal Filing Fee Waived. Juvenile Matter. (SC)
  2. Filed Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) (SEALED) (SC)
  3. Filed Appellant's Motion to Consolidate Cases for Direct Appeal and Request for Expedited Decision. (Consolidate with docket no. 83621) (SC)
  4. Filed Respondent's Notice of Appearance for Jonathan E. VanBoskerck. (SC)
  5. Filed Order Granting Motion to Consolidate Appeals. These appeals shall be consolidated for all appellate purposes. Appellant shall have until March 14, 2022, to file and serve a single opening brief and an appendix. Nos 83621/84276 (SC)
  6. Filed Appellant's Motion to Seal the Briefs and the Appendix, Notice Appeal will be filed as an Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e). Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  7. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e). Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  8. Filed Respondent's Response to Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e). Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  9. Filed Order. Appellant has filed a motion for leave to file his opening brief and appendix under seal pursuant to SRCR 3(4)(h) and SRCR 7. The motion to seal is denied without prejudice. Appellant submitted his opening brief and appendix for filing on March 14, 2022. The clerk of this court shall return those documents unfiled. Appellant shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix, along with any renewed motion to seal or motion to file certain documents subject to redaction. Appellant has filed a motion to expedite the resolution of these consolidated appeals, wherein he seeks to have the appeals "reviewed on an emergency basis pursuant to NRAP 27(e)." This court grants the motion to the following extent. The resolution of this appeal shall be expedited to the extent that this court's docket permits. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  10. Filed Appellant's Motion to File Redacted Briefs as well as Redacted Appellant's Appendix and Respondent's Appendix. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  11. Filed Order Granting Motion. The clerk of this court shall file the opening brief and redacted appendix received on March 31, 2022. The clerk shall file the unredacted appendix received on March 31, 2022, under seal. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answering brief. Nos 83621/84276. (SC)
  12. Filed Appellant's Opening Brief. Nos. 83621/84276 (FILED PER ORDER 4/19/22). (SC)
  13. Filed Appellant's Appendix, Vols. 1-2 (Redacted). Nos. 83621/84276. (FILED PER ORDER 4/19/22). (SC)
  14. Filed Appellant's Appendix, Vols. 1-2 (Un-Redacted). Nos. 83621/84276. (FILED PER ORDER 4/19/22). (SC)
  15. Filed Respondent's Answering Brief. Nos. 83621/84276. (SC)
  16. Filed Appellant's Reply Brief. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  17. Briefing Completed/To Screening. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  18. Filed Order Scheduling Oral Argument. this matter is scheduled for oral argument on November 8, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. in Las Vegas. The argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  19. Filed Appellant's Notice of Appearance for Julian Gregory. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  20. Filed Order. The Special Public Defender has filed a notice that Chief Deputy Special Public Defender Julian Gregory is appearing as counsel for appellant. The clerk of this court shall add Mr. Gregory as counsel of record for appellant. The Special Public Defender also informs this court that W. Jeremy Storms is no longer employed with the Special Public Defender's office. Accordingly, the clerk of this court shall remove Mr. Storms as counsel of record for appellant. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  21. Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  22. Oral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the Court En Banc. Nos. 83621/84276. (SC).
  23. Filed Authored Opinion. "Affirmed." Before the Court En Banc. Author: Herndon, J. Majority: Stiglich/Cadish/Herndon/Parraguirre. Pickering, J., dissenting. 139 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 1 fn1 [The Honorable Patricia Lee and the Honorable Linda Bell did not participate in the decision of this matter]. En Banc. Nos. 83621/84276 (SC)
  24. Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. NOS. 83621/84276. (SC)
  25. Issued Remittitur. NOS. 83621/84276. (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more