Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-05
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 36 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Jaime, Marcos R
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Stipulation and Order Filed
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Proof of Service Comment Served: Marcos R Jaime. Personal Service
  4. Income and Expense Declaration
  5. Answer Filed Family Support
  6. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Answer was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Department of Child Support Services P.O.Box Fresno, Ca. 93779-2946
  7. Notice of Motion Comment Entry of Judg, CS, HC, Join - @8:00AM D302
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Marcos R Jaime Mailed:
  9. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Jasmin C Ortega. Mailed on
  10. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  11. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  12. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  13. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  14. Appeared in Person
  15. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  16. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Marcos R Jaime, Jasmin C Ortega. Mailed on
  17. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment cont'd from to allow Resp to be present
  18. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  19. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  20. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  21. Appeared in Person
  22. Income and Expense Declaration Comment w/attachments
  23. Motion Filed Comment Hrg. Date: Time: 8am Dept. 302
  24. Responsive Declaration Comment to RFO / Hrg. Date: Time: 8am Dept. 302
  25. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed: Served: Marcos R Jaime & Jasmin C Ortega
  26. General Motion Original Type Motion Modify Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment modify cs set by respondent Parties Present Respondent: JAIME, MARCOS R Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  27. Appeared in Person
  28. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Jasmin C Ortega / Mailed on
  29. Stipulation and Order Filed
  30. Motion Modify Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Cancel Reason Off Calendar Comment cont'd from to ensure proper service to OP and stipulation to be filed
  31. Modification OSC/Motion - Re: Child Support
  32. Income and Expense Declaration
  33. Responsive Declaration Comment Hearing Date: at 8:00 AM in Dept. 302.
  34. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Marcos R Jaime & Jasmin C Ortega / Mailed:
  35. Motion Modify Child Support Original Type Motion Modify Child Support Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: JAIME, MARCOS R Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  36. Appeared in Person

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more