Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-22
Status CLOSED - CLOSED
Type C 2 Ccld: Complex Com Lit Division
Docket 44 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Argonaut Insurance Company
Defendant Artesian Utility Development
Photo of Hon. Legrow Abigail M

Judge

Hon. Legrow Abigail M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. COURT DISMISSAL
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. WRIT ISSUED
  6. MOTION TO DISMISS
  7. BRIEF SCHEDULE FILED
  8. RE-NOTICE
  9. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  10. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  11. RSP MOTION TO DISMISS
  12. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  13. ORDER
  14. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  15. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  16. ORDER
  17. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  18. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 LETTER TO THE HONORABLE ABIGAIL M. LEGROW FROM DARYLL HAWTHORNE-SEARIGHT DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2022 REGARDING PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68162067
  19. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  20. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 ARGONAUT LETTER TO HONORABLE LEGROW RE PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68163297
  21. RSP MOTION TO DISMISS
  22. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT, ARTESIAN UTILITY DEVELOPMENT, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS NOTICE OF RESPONSE PROPOSED ORDER EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68182612
  23. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  24. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 1, 2022 LETTER TO THE HONORABLE ABIGAIL M. LEGROW FROM DARYLL HAWTHORNE-SEARIGHT, ESQUIRE DATED SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 REGARDING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68187878
  25. ORDER
  26. ORDER SIGNED BY DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 4, 2022 ORDER SIGNED BY: LEGROW, ABIGAIL M LETTER FROM LEGROW, J. TO COUNSEL. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ITS REPLY IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT MAY FILE A REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 6, 2022. ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68188941
  27. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  28. REPLY BRIEF FILED DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 8, 2022 DEFENDANT ARTESIAN UTILITY DEVELOPMENT, INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO SUPERIOR COURT RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR DEFENDANT ARTESIAN UTILITY DEVELOPMENT, INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO SUPERIOR COURT RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1) ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68222034
  29. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  30. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 13, 2022 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO SUPERIOR COURT RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1) IS GRANTED PLAINTIFFS ORAL REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN DENIED AS THE TIME TO FILE HAS PASSED ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68244789
  31. ORDER
  32. ORDER SIGNED BY DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 15, 2022 ORDER SIGNED BY: LEGROW, ABIGAIL M GRANTED WITH AMENDMENTS (PROPOSED ORDER TO DEFENDANT ARTESIAN UTILITY DEVELOPMENT, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO SUPERIOR COURT RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1)) PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. THE COURT'S REASONING IS CONTAINED IN ITS BENCH RULING ISSUED ON OCTOBER 12, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. ACCEPTED BY: RH TRANSACTION ID: 68245735
  33. COURT DISMISSAL
  34. COURT DISMISSAL SIGNED BY: DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 14, 2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more