Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-29
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type C 2 Ccld: Complex Com Lit Division
Docket 135 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Elavon, Inc. | Elavon, Inc. | Elavon, Inc.
Defendant Electronic Transaction Systems Corp. | Vaughan, Edward | Akkad, Hadi
Photo of Hon. Legrow Abigail M

Judge

Hon. Legrow Abigail M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING CCLD
  2. LETTER
  3. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  4. STIPULATION
  5. STIPULATION
  6. ORDER
  7. ORDER
  8. MOTION TO DISMISS
  9. STIPULATION
  10. ORDER
  11. NOTICE OF HEARING
  12. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  13. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  14. MOTION
  15. ORDER
  16. MOTION
  17. STAYED
  18. ORDER
  19. STIPULATION
  20. ORDER
  21. STIPULATION
  22. ORDER
  23. STIPULATION
  24. ORDER
  25. STAYED
  26. LETTER
  27. STIPULATION
  28. ORDER
  29. STIPULATION
  30. ORDER
  31. STIPULATION
  32. ORDER
  33. STIPULATION
  34. ORDER
  35. STIPULATION
  36. ORDER
  37. STIPULATION
  38. ORDER
  39. STIPULATION
  40. ORDER
  41. STIPULATION
  42. ORDER
  43. STIPULATION
  44. ORDER
  45. STIPULATION
  46. ORDER
  47. STIPULATION
  48. ORDER
  49. MOTION
  50. ORDER
  51. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  52. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  53. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  54. MOTION TO DISMISS
  55. ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
  56. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  57. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  58. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  59. STIPULATION
  60. ORDER
  61. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
  62. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  63. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  64. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  65. OPENING BRIEF FILED
  66. NOTICE
  67. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  68. OPENING BRIEF FILED
  69. STIPULATION
  70. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: JULY 16, 2024 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (JULY 29, 2024 TO OCTOBER 28, 2024) ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 73643525
  71. ORDER
  72. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 17, 2024 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (JULY 29, 2024 TO OCTOBER 28, 2024)) ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 73672328
  73. STIPULATION
  74. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 11, 2024 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (OCT. 28, 2024 TO JANUARY 27, 2025) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 74728119
  75. ORDER
  76. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 12, 2024 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (OCT. 28, 2024 TO JANUARY 27, 2025)) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 74735955
  77. STIPULATION
  78. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 16, 2025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (FROM JANUARY 27, 2025 TO APRIL 28, 2025) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 75442284
  79. ORDER
  80. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 18, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (FROM JANUARY 27, 2025 TO APRIL 28, 2025)) ACCEPTED BY: CP TRANSACTION ID: 75456134
  81. STIPULATION
  82. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: APRIL 24, 2025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (APRIL 28, 2025 TO JULY 28, 2025) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 76131989
  83. ORDER
  84. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: APRIL 26, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (APRIL 28, 2025 TO JULY 28, 2025)) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 76144263
  85. STIPULATION
  86. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: JULY 24, 2025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (JULY 28, 2025 TO OCTOBER 27, 2025) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 76709230
  87. ORDER
  88. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 24, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION FOR 90 DAYS (JULY 28, 2025 TO OCTOBER 27, 2025)) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 76710735
  89. STIPULATION
  90. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 29, 2025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77450441
  91. ORDER
  92. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 29, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77456159
  93. STIPULATION
  94. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 18, 2025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE UNDER SEAL ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77795599
  95. ORDER
  96. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 20, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE UNDER SEAL) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77809274
  97. MOTION
  98. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 22, 2025 PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT [CONFIDENTIAL] EXHIBIT 1 TO PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT [CONFIDENTIAL REDLINE] EXHIBIT 2 TO PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77829675
  99. ORDER
  100. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 25, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: ADAMS, MEGHAN GRANTED WITH AMENDMENTS ([PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT) ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77847380
  101. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  102. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 26, 2025 [CONFIDENTIAL] SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT [CONFIDENTIAL] EXHIBIT A TO SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT [CONFIDENTIAL] REDLINE TO SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: RB TRANSACTION ID: 77850815

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more