Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Shawnee Court

Court

Shawnee Court

Kansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-02
Status Case Dismissed
Type Cv Premises Liability
Docket 74 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hartshorn, Donna also Known As Hartshorn, Donna A
Defendant Kansas Entertainment, Llc
Photo of Hon. Mahoney, William

Judge

Hon. Mahoney, William

Wyandotte County (KS)

Kansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Notice to Take Deposition
  3. PLE: Petition PETITION FOR DAMAGES PLE: Petition
  5. Demand For Jury Trial Days To Complete: 1
  7. Document Service Summons: Issued on 8/29/2022; to Penn National Gaming Inc on 8/29/2022; Assigned to Process Server; Service Fee of $0.00
  9. Issued Summons: Issued on 08/29/2022; to Penn National Gaming Inc on 08/29/2022; Assigned to Process Server. Service fee of $0.00.
  11. PLE: Summons Summons PLE: Summons
  13. PLE: Amended Petition FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES PLE: Amended Petition
  15. Attorney of Record Attorney of Record Robert W Tormohlen
  17. PLE: Answer Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Petition PLE: Answer (with MO Bar #)
  19. Attorney of Record Attorney of Record Elizabeth Jane Brown
  21. PLE: Answer Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Petition PLE: Answer (with KS Bar #)
  23. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service Defendant's First Interrogatories and Requests for Prod. DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  25. Served Summons: Served agent service with Bonnie Love Intake Specialist at 120 S Central Ave Clayton Mo to Penn National Gaming Inc on 8/31/2022; Assigned to Process Server. Service Fee of $0.00.
  27. AFF: Affidavit (Generic) Affidavit of Service AFF: Affidavit (Generic)
  29. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service - 1st IROGS & RFP DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  31. PLE: Response - Answer COS - AO to IROGs & RFP PLE: Response - Answer
  33. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  35. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  37. MOT: Motion (Generic) Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order MOT: Motion (Generic)
  39. Hearing Scheduled Hearing Scheduled (Motion 01/13/2023 09:00 AM) Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order
  41. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  43. Hearing Rescheduled Hearing Rescheduled (Zoom Hearing 02/02/2023 01:00 PM) Sched Conf
  45. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service - 2nd IROGS & RFP DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  47. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Notice of Deposition - Megan Young NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
  49. ORD: Order (Generic) Stipulated Protective Order ORD: Order (Generic)
  51. Hearing Scheduled Hearing Scheduled (Jury Trial 11/06/2023 09:00 AM)
  52. Hearing Scheduled Hearing Scheduled (Zoom Pretrial Conference 09/29/2023 09:00 AM)
  53. ORD: Order (Generic) Case Management Conference Order ORD: Order (Generic)
  54. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service DIS: Discovery (Generic)
  55. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's Notice to Take Videotaped Deposition NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
  56. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's Notice to Take Videotaped Deposition NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
  57. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's First Amended Notice of Deposition NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
  58. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's First Amended Notice of Deposition NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
  59. MOT: Motion (Generic) Plaintiff's Motion to compel Document Production
  60. MOT: Response Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Document Prod
  61. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiffs' notice to take videotaped deposition
  62. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's First Amended Notice to Take Videotaped Deposition
  63. Judge Note 5-18-23 ZOOM Motion to Compel Hearing. Pet. by Nick Schmiemeier and Defendant by Elizabeth Brown for Robert Tormohlen. Record taken by Arantes Luna CR. Motion to compel production of 4 emails that were identified as work product on the privilege log. The court reviewed plaintiff s motion and defendant response. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff for the following reasons: These emails were not prepared or even cc d to counsel for defendant. The fact that a demand letter and follow-up letter from another law firm did not give rise to triggering in anticipation of litigation. The employees communication is not privileged as work product. In the deposition, the employee stated he did not ask help in preparing or even copy Mr. Tormohlen. The court finds that even if there was notification of a demand letter, unless Mr. Tormohlen or counsel are actively directing or actively engaged at that point in the process, then it is not privileged communication as work product. Defendants failed to demonstrate that this was work product. Therefore, the four emails should be turned over to Plaintiff subject to the agreed protective order over Defendant s objection. Counsel to submit journal entry. WPM
  64. Record Taken by Arantes Luna, CCR
  65. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's expert disclosures
  66. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Plaintiff's preliminary witness and exhibit list
  67. ORD: Order (Generic) ORDER
  68. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Defendant's Preliminary Witness and Exhibit List
  69. DIS: Discovery (Generic) Certificate of Service
  70. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoenas for Production of Documents
  71. ORD: Subpoena - Clerk Signed Subpoena - Anthony Fenton
  72. ORD: Subpoena - Clerk Signed Subpoena - Dr. Smith
  73. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Notice to Take Oral and Videotape Deposition
  74. NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required Notice to Take Deposition

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more