Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-25
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 59 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Coastline Capital Fund Management Llc
Defendant Bettie Darlene Hodges|John Doe, Real Name Unk., Unk.spouse, If Any, Ofbettie Darlene Hodge
Photo of Hon. BRIAN J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. BRIAN J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. OTION TO VACATE $30.00 . JAMES L SASSANO (0062253) MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL ENTRY 09/27/2022 - DENIED
  3. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES L SASSANO
  4. LAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER OF 8/30/22. SINCE PLAINTIFF DID NOT HAVE STANDING AT THE TIME THE CASE WAS FILED, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE MOOT. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  5. OTION FILED FOR P1 COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT LLC JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF 09/14/2022 - MOOT
  6. EFAULT HEARING HELD. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL APPEARED. DEFENDANT(S) DID NOT APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS HELD IN ABEYANCE. PLAINTIFF MUST FILE PROOF THAT THE PLAINTIFF IS THE PROPER PARTY IN INTEREST ON OR BEFORE 9/13/22. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. OTICE FILED BY P1 COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT LLC ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 NOTICE OF DEFAULT HEARING
  8. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 08/30/2022 AT 01:00 PM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. OTICE FILED BY P1 COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT LLC ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  10. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 08/30/2022 - HELD IN ABEYANCE
  11. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT LLC ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  12. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT LLC ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  13. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT LLC ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES L. SASSANO, ESQ.
  14. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47194142 RETURNED 06/02/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  15. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47194141 RETURNED 04/28/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HODGES/BETTIE/DARLENE - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  16. EGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  17. ROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $507.2040- LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  18. RE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $257.20
  19. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47194142 RETURNED 4/28/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47194141 RETURNED 4/28/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HODGES/BETTIE/DARLENE - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  21. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47106030 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/30/2022 JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE PROCESSED BY COC 04/28/2022.
  22. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47106027 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/30/2022 HODGES/BETTIE/DARLENE PROCESSED BY COC 04/28/2022.
  23. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES L SASSANO
  24. FFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  25. ON 04/04/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED HODGES/BETTIE/DARLENE WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  26. ON 04/04/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  27. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  28. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  29. UMS COMPLAINT(47194142) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE 3642 E. 108TH ST. CLEVELAND, OH 44105-0000
  30. UMS COMPLAINT(47194141) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BETTIE DARLENE HODGES 3642 E. 108TH ST. CLEVELAND, OH 44105-0000
  31. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. RIT FEE
  34. RIT FEE
  35. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR SERVICE
  36. UMS COMPLAINT(47106030) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE 18217 HARVARD AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  37. UMS COMPLAINT(47106027) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BETTIE DARLENE HODGES 18217 HARVARD AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  38. UMS COMPLAINT(47106029) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNK., UNK.SPOUSE, IF ANY, OFBETTIE DARLENE HODGE 18217 HARVARD AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  39. UMS COMPLAINT(47106028) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: BETTIE DARLENE HODGES 18217 HARVARD AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  40. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  41. AGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  42. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  43. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  44. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  45. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  46. RIT FEE
  47. RIT FEE
  48. RIT FEE
  49. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  50. RIT FEE
  51. UDGE BRIAN J CORRIGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  52. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  53. EGAL RESEARCH
  54. EGAL NEWS
  55. EGAL AID
  56. OMPUTER FEE
  57. LERK'S FEE
  58. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES L SASSANO
  59. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES L SASSANO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more