Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-16
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 22 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Grajeda, Isaac
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Paternity
  4. Proof of Service Comment Served: Isaac Grajeda / Personal Service
  5. Answer Filed Family Support
  6. Income and Expense Declaration
  7. Notice of Motion Comment Judgment, Parentage, Join Other Parent / Hrg: @8am Dept 302
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Isaac Grajeda and Nancy A Munoz / Mailed on
  9. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Respondent: GRAJEDA, ISAAC Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  10. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment Parentage Parties Present Respondent: GRAJEDA, ISAAC Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  11. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Join Other Parent Parties Present Respondent: GRAJEDA, ISAAC Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  12. Appeared in Person
  13. Appeared in Person
  14. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  15. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed: Served: Nancy A Munoz
  16. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment cont'd from to allow parties to participate in genetic testing
  17. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Parentage
  18. Genetic Test Original Type Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: GRAJEDA, ISAAC Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  19. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  20. Appeared in Person
  21. Confidential document filed Comment Genetic Test results
  22. Companion Case Calendared by Court Original Type Companion Case Calendared by Court Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment calendared w/ 19CEFS02109 Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more