Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-25
Status Judgment
Type 31 Limited Commercial Under $10,000
Docket 88 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Kolstad, Robert
Defendant Bellinger, Cassidy|Modern Maids Of Fresno
Photo of Hon. Cullers Mark

Judge

Hon. Cullers Mark

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Unlawful Detainer Dismissal Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Judgment
  2. Civil case cover sheet View Document Civil Case Cover Sheet
  3. Unlawful Detainer Supplemental Cover Sheet View Document Mandatory Cover Sheet Comment Commercial
  4. Notice of Hearing View Document CV-15 Notice of Dismissal Hearing 3/29/22 Comment UDDI set in Dept 404 at 8:30 a.m.
  5. Summons issued and filed View Document Summons
  6. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment eFiled
  7. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document - Request for Default Comment 3-Day notice is missing from Complaint. No proof of Service filed. Also Judgment not entered: Clerk is unable to Grant Money Judgments
  8. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed View Document - Declaration of CCP 585
  9. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment eFiled
  10. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document - Request for Default Comment 3-Day notice is missing from Complaint. No proof of service filed for Summons. CIV-100 form #1.a/b/c does not match Complaint. #6 is not signed. Also #6 doesn't lists all parties being mailed default paperwork.
  11. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed View Document - Declaration of CCP 585
  12. Proof of Service View Document - Proof of Service by Mail of 3-Day Notice Comment Proof of Service By mail of 3-day notice mailed on
  13. Request for Default Received Comment Without Judgment eFiled
  14. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document - Request for Default Comment 3-Day notice is missing from Complaint. No proof of service filed for Summons. CIV-100 form #1.a does not match Complaint. Also #6 doesn't lists all parties being mailed default paperwork.
  15. Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 Order for: Posting
  16. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  17. Application for Publication/Posting Order filed View Document - Denied Posting Order Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Type of Document: Order to post DENIED. The name listged on the application does not match the complaint. The declaration of due diligence lacks the contact information of the process server, the signature by who ever attempted service and not a party to the action per CCP 414.10. The due diligence does not list what documents were attempted to be served.
  18. Unlawful Detainer Dismissal Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  19. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment
  20. Appeared in Person
  21. Order Received for Signature View Document - Order Received to Post Summons Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 Order for: posting of summons
  22. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  23. Application for Publication/Posting Order filed View Document - Denied Order to Post Summons Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Type of Document: Order to Post denied: Declaration of Due Diligence is missing: Date and Signature of Process Server, Case Title and Case number, and CCP 414.10 information. copy emailed to filer
  24. Order Received for Signature View Document - Order Received to Post Summons Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 on Order for: Posting of Summons
  25. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  26. Application for Publication/Posting Order filed View Document - Denied Order to Post Summons Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Type of Document: Order to Post DENIED Names of parties to be served and address where service is to take place, does not match the Complaint emailed order to filer
  27. Order Received for Signature View Document - Received Posting Order Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 Order for: Posting
  28. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  29. Application for Publication/Posting Order filed View Document - Denied Posting Order Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Type of Document: Order to post DENIED. Name on Posting Order does not match complaint.
  30. Application for Publication/Posting Order filed View Document - Granted Posting Order Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Type of Document: Order to post GRANTED as to Modern Maids of Fresno, form of entity unknown, Cassidy Bellinger an individual, DBA Modern Maids of Fresno, AKA Cassidy Balenzar.
  31. Request for Default Received Comment Without Judgment Efiled
  32. Request to Enter Default Denied Comment Defective Proof of Service
  33. Proof of Service View Document POS Defective Comment Defective Proof of Service Multiple parties served on one document, Each document must be submitted as its own lead document.
  34. Request for Default Received Comment Without Judgment Efiled
  35. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document 58231Requestf0031cd5 Comment Defective Proofs of Services
  36. Proof of Service View Document 58231ProofofS01c7975
  37. Proof of Service View Document 58231ProofofS020efc7
  38. Summons and Complaint Unserved Comment Defective - Proof does not include CCP Code
  39. Summons and Complaint Unserved Comment Defective - Proof does not include CCP Code
  40. Unlawful Detainer Dismissal Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  41. Appeared in Person
  42. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment
  43. Request for Default Received Comment Without Judgment Efiled
  44. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document Request for Default Comment Per CCP 1161, 3 Day Notice attached to the Declaration for Default Judgment by Court, does not provide phone number of the place of payment. Proof of Services are defective.
  45. Proof of Service View Document Proof of Service for Modern Maids
  46. Proof of Service View Document Proof of Service for Cassidy Bellinger
  47. Summons and Complaint Unserved Comment DEFECTIVE: Time of Service not provided
  48. Summons and Complaint Unserved Comment DEFECTIVE: Time of Service not provided
  49. Request for Default Received Comment Without Judgment Efiled
  50. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document Request for Default Denied Comment #1c Name does not match with complaint
  51. Proof of Service View Document Proof of Service
  52. Proof of Service View Document Proof of Service
  53. Summons and Complaint Served
  54. Summons and Complaint Served
  55. Request to Enter Default View Document 58687Requestf006d5b2 Comment Entered as to:
  56. Request for Default Received Comment Without Judgment Efiled
  57. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment NO CIV 100 FORM efiled
  58. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment efiled
  59. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document - Request for Default Comment Previously defaulted. No Action Taken: Judgment NOT entered: Judgment form: #3a, names do not match Complaint Also Judgment is requesting for money but #2 and #7 on CIV-100 form is blank. No declaration of CCP 585 submitted pursuant to CRC 3.1800 for money requested.
  60. Judgment Received View Document - Judgment NO ACTION TAKEN Comment No Action Taken: Judgment NOT entered: Judgment form: #3a, names do not match Complaint Also Judgment is requesting for money but #2 and #7 on CIV-100 form is blank. No declaration of CCP 585 submitted pursuant to CRC 3.1800 for money requested.
  61. Request to Enter Default Denied View Document Request for Default Comment Default Previously Entered
  62. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed View Document Declaration
  63. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment in E-File
  64. Request for Court Judgment Comment FILED
  65. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed
  66. Dismissal of Doe Defendant(s) Comment Without Prejudice Does: 1-10
  67. Judgment Received Comment Forward to: 404
  68. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  69. Order Denied View Document Order Denied Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Re: Judgment
  70. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment Efiled
  71. Request to Enter Default Denied Comment Previously defaulted
  72. Judgment Received Comment Forward to: 404
  73. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed
  74. Unlawful Detainer Dismissal Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  75. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  76. Appeared in Person
  77. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment
  78. Order Denied View Document Order Denied Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Comment Judgment not entered-Defendants name listed on #3a of the judgment does not match defendants name provided on #1 of the Complaint. Also, the address provided on the Judgment does not match the address on the complaint. Name and address must match exactly.
  79. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment Efiled
  80. Request to Enter Default Denied Comment Default previously entered; #1d names do not match with complaint
  81. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed
  82. Request for Default Received Comment With Judgment Efiled
  83. Request to Enter Default Denied Comment Default previously entered
  84. Judgment Received Comment Forwarded to Dept 404 Judge Mark Cullers
  85. Declaration for Default Judgment by Court filed
  86. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  87. Writ of Possession Issued View Document - Writ of Possession Issued
  88. Return filed View Document -Return filed Comment Return of Writ of Possession Filed wholly satisfied as to possession of the premises only.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more