Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-23
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 110 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Midfirst Bank
Defendant Ramoo, Llc C/o Said Hamdan|Sharon Decarlo|Robert Decarlo|Deborah Kullman
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(53649666) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(53649665) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRADLEY HULL [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(53649664) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(53649663) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(53649662) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHARLES P ROYER [email protected]
  7. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, FILED 04/05/2024, IS GRANTED. ATTORNEY ROYER INFORMED THE COURT THAT HIS CLIENTS, CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANTS, HAVE ALSO BEEN PAID IN FULL. CONSEQUENTLY, THE CASE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/10/2024 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED. MAGISTRATE: JIM L JACKSON (0078764) REASON: COURT SCHEDULE CONFLICT. (notice sent).
  9. OTION FILED FOR P1 MIDFIRST BANK JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS 04/24/2024 - GRANTED
  10. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/10/2024 AT 09:00 AM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. COUNSEL MAY EMAIL MAGISTRATE JACKSON AT [email protected] IN THE EVENT OF A SCHEDULE CONFLICT OR IF AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. TTORNEY CONFERENCE HELD. ATTORNEYS HULL, RITCH AND ROYER PARTICIPATED. ATTORNEY HULL INFORMED THE COURT THAT A PORTION OF THE CASE HAS BEEN RESOLVED, AND THAT HE WOULD BE TAKING A PAYOFF FIGURE FROM PLAINTIFF TO HIS CLIENTS TO FACILITATE A GLOBAL RESOLUTION OF THE CASE. TO MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THE SETTLEMENT EFFORTS, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE AN ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 03/14/2024 AT 09:00 AM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. COUNSEL MAY EMAIL MAGISTRATE JACKSON AT [email protected] IN THE EVENT OF A SCHEDULE CONFLICT OR IF AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. TTORNEY CONFERENCE HELD. ATTORNEYS HULL, RITCH AND ROYER PARTICIPATED. THE PROPERTY OWNER'S EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THE LITIGATION CONTINUE, THOUGH THERE ARE MORE STEPS TO COMPLETE BEFORE THE CASE CAN CONCLUDE. TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE PROGRESS AND/OR WORK THROUGH OTHER OPTIONS, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE AN ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. TTORNEY CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 12/19/2023 AT 09:00 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 01/18/2024 AT 09:00 AM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. COUNSEL MAY EMAIL MAGISTRATE JACKSON AT [email protected] IN THE EVENT OF A SCHEDULE CONFLICT OR IF AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE.. . NOTICE ISSUED
  15. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 12/19/2023 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED. MAGISTRATE: JIM L JACKSON (0078764) REASON: COUNSEL PROVIDED AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE IN LIEU OF THE CONFERENCE CALL. (notice sent).
  16. NSWER FILED BY D1 RAMOO, LLC ATTORNEY BRADLEY HULL 0083282 ANSWER TO CROSSCLAIM
  17. TTORNEY CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 12/20/2023 AT 09:30 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 12/19/2023 AT 09:00 AM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. COUNSEL MAY EMAIL MAGISTRATE JACKSON AT [email protected] IN THE EVENT OF A SCHEDULE CONFLICT OR IF AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE.. . NOTICE ISSUED
  18. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 12/20/2023 AT 09:30 AM IS CANCELLED. MAGISTRATE: JIM L JACKSON (0078764) REASON: DATE AND TIME SET IN ERROR. (notice sent).
  19. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/20/2023 AT 09:30 AM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. COUNSEL MAY EMAIL MAGISTRATE JACKSON AT [email protected] IN THE EVENT OF A SCHEDULE CONFLICT OR IF AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. TTORNEY CONFERENCE HELD. ATTORNEYS HULL, RITCH AND ROYER PARTICIPATED. ATTORNEY HULL INFORMED THE COURT THAT THERE ARE A FEW ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED, BUT THE CONSENSUS BELIEVES THAT A RESOLUTION MAY BE NEARING. ATTORNEY HULL'S REQUEST FOR A BRIEF CONTINUANCE TO RESPOND TO THE CROSSCLAIM OF DEFENDANTS DECARLO AND KULLMAN IS GRANTED. A RESPONSE TO THE CROSSCLAIM IS DUE ON OR BEFORE 12/08/2023 ABSENT FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. ATTORNEY RITCH WILL BE PROVIDING A PAYOFF QUOTE AND REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL PAYOFF QUOTE. ATTORNEY HULL TO PROVIDE ATTORNEY ROYER WITH A LIST OF QUESTIONS TO ASSIST IN RESOLVING ANY POTENTIAL IMPEDIMENT TO SETTLEMENT. TO MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THE SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE AN EMAIL STATUS UPDATE BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. -MAIL STATUS UPDATE SET FOR 11/22/2023 AT 04:00 PM. COUNSEL MAY PROVIDE THE STATUS UPDATE TO MAGISTRATE JACKSON VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] ON OR BEFORE THE DATE AND TIME LISTED HEREIN. THE COURT IS WILLING AND ABLE TO SCHEDULE AN ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY OR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UPON REQUEST OF COUNSEL. NOTICE ISSUED
  22. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID CHARLES P ROYER
  23. OUNTER CLAIM / CROSS CLAIM $75 DEFENDANTS SHARON DECARLO, ROBERT DECARLO AND DEBORAH KULLMAN'S CROSS-CLAIM FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT RAMOO, LLC
  24. OTION OF DEFENDANTS DECARLO AND DEBORAH KULLMAN FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT RAMOO, LLC, FILED 09/25/2023, IS GRANTED. AFORESAID DEFENDANTS HAVE 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST RAMOO, LLC. NOTICE ISSUED
  25. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 11/07/2023 AT 01:30 PM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. COUNSEL MAY CONTACT MAGISTRATE JACKSON VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] IF THE AFOREMENTIONED DATE AND TIME BECOMES DIFFICULT OR IF AN EARLIER DATE WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. TTORNEY CONFERENCE HELD. ATTORNEYS HULL, RITCH AND ROYER PARTICIPATED. THE NEWLY FILED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-CLAIM OF THE DECARLO DEFENDANTS IS NOT YET RIPE. ATTORNEY HULL INDICATED THAT HIS CLIENT ENVISIONS SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS THAT COULD RESOLVE THE CASE. TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO WORK TOWARD A RESOLUTION, BUT TO MONITOR THE DISCUSSIONS AND PROVIDE ASSISTANCE AS NEEDED, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE AN ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY SEPARATE ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  27. OTION FILED FOR DEFENDANT(S) SHARON DECARLO(D2), ROBERT DECARLO(D3) and DEBORAH KULLMAN(D4) CHARLES P ROYER 0037104 DEFENDANTS SHARON DECARLO, ROBERT DECARLO AND DEBORAH KULLMAN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT RAMOO, LLC 10/13/2023 - GRANTED
  28. OTICE FILED BY P1 MIDFIRST BANK ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
  29. TTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 09/25/2023 AT 11:00 AM. THIS CASE IS SET FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THIS ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  30. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MIDFIRST BANK ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  31. NSWER FILED BY D1 RAMOO, LLC ATTORNEY BRADLEY HULL 0083282 ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF RAMOO, LLC
  32. ERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 50955592 ADDRESSED TO RAMOO, LLC(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  33. EFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FILED 07/30/2023, IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DUE ON OR BEFORE 08/30/2023, AS REQUESTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  34. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 MIDFIRST BANK ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT OF JUSTIN M RITCH
  35. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 08/25/2023 - GRANTED
  36. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D1 RAMOO, LLC BRADLEY HULL 0083282. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
  37. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 MIDFIRST BANK ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT OF JUSTIN M. RITCH
  38. ON 07/18/2023 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED KULLMAN/DEBORAH/ BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  39. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED NOTICE OF SUMMON SERVICE RETURN
  40. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50989012 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/03/2023 RAMOO, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 07/19/2023.
  41. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50989007 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/11/2023 KULLMAN/DEBORAH/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/19/2023.
  42. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50989008 RETURNED 07/07/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT KULLMAN/DEBORAH/ - NO MAIL RECEPTACLE NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  43. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 MIDFIRST BANK ATTORNEY ANN M JOHNSON 0072981 CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  44. ON 07/10/2023 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED DECARLO/ROBERT/ BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  45. ON 07/10/2023 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED DECARLO/SHARON/ BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  46. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50989011 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/03/2023 DECARLO/SHARON/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  47. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50989009 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/03/2023 KULLMAN/DEBORAH/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  48. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50989010 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/03/2023 DECARLO/ROBERT/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  49. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50955595 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/29/2023 KULLMAN/DEBORAH/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  50. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50955594 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/29/2023 DECARLO/ROBERT/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  51. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50955593 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/29/2023 DECARLO/SHARON/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  52. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  53. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  54. NSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) SHARON DECARLO(D2), ROBERT DECARLO(D3) and DEBORAH KULLMAN(D4) ATTORNEY CHARLES P ROYER 0037104 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS SHARON DECARLO, ROBERT DECARLO AND DEBORAH KULLMAN
  55. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50989008 RETURNED 7/7/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT KULLMAN/DEBORAH/ - OTHER REASON NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  56. UMS COMPLAINT(50989012) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAMOO, LLC 5563 PHEASANTS WALK DRIVE NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070
  57. UMS COMPLAINT(50989011) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHARON DECARLO 15206 ALDENE AVENUE APARTMENT 08 CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  58. UMS COMPLAINT(50989010) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ROBERT DECARLO 15206 ALDENE AVENUE APARTMENT 08 CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  59. UMS COMPLAINT(50989009) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DEBORAH KULLMAN 23002 CHANDLERS LANE APARTMENT 334 OLMSTED FALLS, OH 44138
  60. UMS COMPLAINT(50989008) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DEBORAH KULLMAN 6721 WEST LAW RD VALLEY CITY, OH 44280-0000
  61. UMS COMPLAINT(50989007) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DEBORAH KULLMAN 7227 CADY ROAD, NORTH ROYALTON, MD 44133-0000
  62. UMS COMPLAINT(50991472) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: DEBORAH KULLMAN 23002 CHANDLERS LANE APARTMENT 334 OLMSTED FALLS, OH 44138
  63. UMS COMPLAINT(50991471) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: ROBERT DECARLO 15206 ALDENE AVENUE APARTMENT 08 CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  64. UMS COMPLAINT(50991470) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: SHARON DECARLO 15206 ALDENE AVENUE APARTMENT 08 CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  65. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  67. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  68. RIT FEE
  69. RIT FEE
  70. RIT FEE
  71. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  72. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  73. RIT FEE
  74. RIT FEE
  75. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  76. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  77. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  78. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  79. RIT FEE
  80. RIT FEE
  81. RIT FEE
  82. RIT FEE
  83. UGGESTION OF DEATH FILED BY P1 MIDFIRST BANK ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 SUGGESTION OF DEATH
  84. UMS COMPLAINT(50955595) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DEBORAH KULLMAN 23002 CHANDLERS LANE APARTMENT 334 OLMSTED FALLS, OH 44138
  85. UMS COMPLAINT(50955594) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ROBERT DECARLO 15206 ALDENE AVENUE APARTMENT 08 CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  86. UMS COMPLAINT(50955593) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHARON DECARLO 15206 ALDENE AVENUE APARTMENT 08 CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  87. UMS COMPLAINT(50955592) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAMOO, LLC 5563 PHEASANTS WALK DRIVE NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070
  88. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  89. AGISTRATE JIM L JACKSON ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  90. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  91. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  92. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  93. RIT FEE
  94. RIT FEE
  95. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  96. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  97. RIT FEE
  98. RIT FEE
  99. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  100. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  101. UDGE RICHARD A BELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE DANIEL GAUL
  102. UDGE RICHARD A BELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  103. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  104. EGAL RESEARCH
  105. EGAL NEWS
  106. EGAL AID
  107. OMPUTER FEE
  108. LERK'S FEE
  109. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  110. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more