Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-11
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sullivan University System I Nc C/o Rachel J Mason Attorney At Law
Defendant Marilyn A Morgan
Photo of Hon. BRIAN J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. BRIAN J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(48298409) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MARILYN A MORGAN 14219 TRISKET RD APT 203C CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(48298408) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: J BLAKE THOMAS [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(48298407) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: J BLAKE THOMAS [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(48298406) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RACHEL J. MASON [email protected]
  6. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,886.59 PLUS INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 3% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 SULLIVAN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM I NC ATTORNEY RACHEL J. MASON 0076645 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  8. EFAULT HEARING SET FOR 08/10/2022 AT 10:00 AM. DEFAULT HEARING TO BE CONDUCTED BY TELEPHONE. PKLAINTIFF IS TO INITIATE THE CALL BY CONTACTING THE COURT AT 216-443-8577 WITH ALL PARTIES ON THE LINE. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MORGAN/MARILYN/A 06/09/2022 17:01:43
  10. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR THOMAS/J/BLAKE 06/09/2022 17:01:43
  11. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MASON/RACHEL/J. 06/09/2022 17:01:43
  12. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/11/2022 AT 09:45 AM. IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19, THE CMC SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER MUST BE CONDUCTED VIA TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO INITIATE CALL TO DEFENSE COUNSEL AND THEN CONTACT STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216 443 8577 ONCE ALL PARTIES ARE ON THE LINE.
  13. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 08/10/2022 - GRANTED
  14. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47002440 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/21/2022 MORGAN/MARILYN/A PROCESSED BY COC 04/28/2022.
  15. UMS COMPLAINT(47002440) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARILYN A MORGAN 14219 TRISKET RD APT 203C CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. RIT FEE
  18. UDGE BRIAN J CORRIGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  19. EGAL RESEARCH
  20. EGAL NEWS
  21. EGAL AID
  22. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  23. OMPUTER FEE
  24. LERK'S FEE
  25. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MASON, SCHILLING & MASON CO., L.P.A.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more