Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-16
Type Protection Order
Docket 37 entries
Disposition affirmed

Docket Entries

  1. Opinion Certified Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G Notice Date: 07/26/2022
  2. Document Transmitted
  3. Opinion Issued Memorandum Decision MEMORANDUM DECISION: Friedlander, Sr. J., affirmed Bailey, J., and Weissmann, J., concur. Judicial Officer: Bradford, Cale J. Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G File Stamp: 05/27/2022
  4. Document Transmitted
  5. Electronic Documents Received from Trial Court Clerk. Volumes of Transcripts - One (1) Volumes of Exhibits - One (1) Volumes of T/C - One (1) Received Electronically 3/9/2022 Postmark: 03/09/2022
  6. Case Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 03/10/2022
  7. Transmitted to Court of Appeals
  8. Trial Court Clerk Notified to Transmit Transcript Date Sent: 03/09/2022
  9. Document Transmitted
  10. Document Transmitted
  11. Mail Returned as Undeliverable Recipient: Employee(s) of the Elkhart County Clerk's Office Reason: Command Rejected Name of Document: Transcript Request sent by Odyssey on 3/9/22. Transcript Request resent by mail on 3/10/22. Return Date: 03/09/2022
  12. Appendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: 2 Certificate of Service- Electronically Served to Martin McCloskey, all others by mail on 01/17/22 Attorney: McCaslin, Nancy Party: W, R File Stamp: 01/17/2022
  13. Notice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Appellant's Appendix Party: W, R Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G File Stamp: 01/17/2022
  14. Document Transmitted
  15. Received Document Receive Date: 01/12/22 Appellant's Appendix. The certificate of service does not specify the date of service. Defect has not been cured. PostmarkDate: 01/12/2022
  16. Notice of Defect Not Cured Letter Issued Clerk Comments: Appellant's Appendix. The certificate of service does not specify the date of service. Defect has not been cured. Party: W, R Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G Issue Date: 01/14/2022
  17. Document Transmitted
  18. Corrected Entry Addendum received in error.
  19. Addendum Certificate of Service- Electronically Served to Atty. McCloskey and Mailed to G W 01/10/22 Party: W, R File Stamp: 01/10/2022
  20. Pursuant to App.R. 23(D), Parties Notified of Filing Clerk Comments:Appellant's Addendum Party: W, R Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G Sent Date: 01/12/2022
  21. Document Transmitted
  22. Document Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments: Motion to Compel NCT Party: W, R Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G Date Sent: 01/11/2022
  23. Document Transmitted
  24. Brief - Appellant Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/10/22 to Atty McCloskey; Mailed 01/10/22 to G W Attorney: McCaslin, Nancy Party: W, R File Stamp: 01/10/2022
  25. Received Document Receive Date: 01/10/22 Appellant's Confidential Addendum to Brief - if entire Addendum is confidential; lacks Notice of Exclusion; otherwise, lacks Public version and Notice of Exclusion. PostmarkDate: 01/10/2022
  26. Received Document Receive Date: 01/06/22 Appellant's Appendix. The certificate of service does not specify the date of service and indicates service by e-mail which is not a proper form of service according to the rules. PostmarkDate: 01/06/2022
  27. Notice of Defect Issued Appellant's Appendix Party: W, R Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G Issue Date: 01/10/2022
  28. Document Transmitted
  29. Received Document Receive Date: 12/13/2021 Motion to Compel Clerk to Issue Notice of Completion of Transcript - filings by attorneys must be submitted by e-filing PostmarkDate: 12/07/2021
  30. Notice of Defect Issued Motion to Compel NCT Party: W, R Serve: McCaslin, Nancy Serve: W, G Issue Date: 12/13/2021
  31. Document Transmitted
  32. Notice of Completion of Transcript Method of Service Not Provided/Not Specified 12/10/21 File Stamp: 12/10/2021
  33. Notice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Yet Completed Method of Service Not Provided/Not Specified 10/25/21 File Stamp: 10/25/2021
  34. Notice of Appeal Filed **Public and Cconfidential** Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 10/16/21 Attorney: McCaslin, Nancy Party: W, R File Stamp: 10/16/2021
  35. NOA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 10/18/2021
  36. Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 10/16/21 Party: W, R File Stamp: 10/16/2021
  37. Document Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more