Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-15
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 22 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Robles, Gerardo
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Income and Expense Declaration
  2. Paternity
  3. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  4. Proof of Service Comment Served: Gerardo Robles Substituted Service:
  5. Income and Expense Declaration Comment w/ attachments
  6. Answer Filed Family Support
  7. Notice of Motion Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Parentage, Join Other Parent / @8am Dept 302
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Parties served: Gerardo Robles and Araceli Verduzco-Diaz / Date mailed:
  9. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  10. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  11. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  12. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Parentage
  13. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Join Other Parent Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  14. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  15. Appeared in Person
  16. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served by Mail
  17. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Cont at Resp' req as he was deployed to Japan and wouldn't return until after Jan 7//Mom has been joined/Resp can request appointed counsel/Reserve juris /both parties auth to appear via Zoom Parties Present Respondent: ROBLES, GERARDO Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  18. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: ROBLES, GERARDO Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  19. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: ROBLES, GERARDO Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  20. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment (Parentage) Parties Present Respondent: ROBLES, GERARDO Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  21. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  22. Appeared in Person

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more