Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-14
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Brandon Gazdak
Defendant Mercedes Hudson|Raymond Downey
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. HE COURT NOTES THAT ON 10/24/2023, PLAINTIFF FILED A NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THEREFORE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS OF 10/24/2023. FINAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. OTICE FILED BY P1 BRANDON GAZDAK ATTORNEY ROBERT E SOLES 0046707 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  4. OTICE FILED BY P1 BRANDON GAZDAK ATTORNEY ROBERT E SOLES 0046707 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY FROM HUDSON AND DOWNEY
  5. ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/25/2023 AT 11:30 A.M. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. DO NOT CALL THE COURT. DATES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUANCE UNLESS A MOTION HAS BEEN DOCKETED AND HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. NSWER FILED BY D2 RAYMOND DOWNEY ATTORNEY MARK C LINDSEY 0086249 ANSWER OF RAYMOND DOWNEY AND MERCEDES HUDSON TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  7. UMS COMPLAINT(51262813) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MERCEDES HUDSON 19901 FAIRWAY AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137 ANSWER DATE: 08/29/2023
  8. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  9. RIT FEE
  10. RAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE FOR ORDINARY MAIL
  11. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50896765 RETURNED 7/25/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HUDSON/MERCEDES/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. TIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED LEAVE TO PLEAD
  13. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50896766 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/27/2023 DOWNEY/RAYMOND/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/12/2023.
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(50896766) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAYMOND DOWNEY 3800 NORTH HAMPTON ROAD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44121
  15. UMS COMPLAINT(50896765) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MERCEDES HUDSON 19901 FAIRWAY AVENUE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. RIT FEE
  19. RIT FEE
  20. UDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  21. EGAL RESEARCH
  22. EGAL NEWS
  23. EGAL AID
  24. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  25. OMPUTER FEE
  26. LERK'S FEE
  27. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ROBERT E SOLES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more