Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-12
Status Open
Type 43 Unlimited Other Petition (not Specified)
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hernandez, Maria
Defendant Reyes Cervantes, Silvia
Photo of Hon. Cabrera, Carlos A

Judge

Hon. Cabrera, Carlos A

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Review Hearing - Harassment Judicial Officer Cabrera, Carlos Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  2. Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  3. Request for orders to stop Harassment filed
  4. Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 Order for: Notice of Hearing
  5. Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 Order for: TRO
  6. Order Received for Signature Comment (Pending Hearing) After Hearing
  7. TRO Petition Denied Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie Comment Order Show Cause Hearing: at 8:30 AM in Dept. 404
  8. Request to Continue CHRO Hearing (NO TRO) Comment Date: Time: 1:30 PM Dept. 404
  9. Show Cause Regard Harassment Original Type Show Cause Regard Harassment Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Heard
  10. Minute Order Attachment
  11. Appeared in Person Comment Olga Saito obo Petitioner
  12. Mutual Stay Away Agreement Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie Comment Follow up hearing set. Date: Time: 8:30 AM Dept: 404
  13. Proof of Service Comment Order on Request to Cont Hearing, Denied TRO, Request for TRO, Response Packet
  14. Chambers Work- Pre Original Type Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  15. Request Filed Comment Modify Restraining Order
  16. Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 404 Order for: Notice of Hearing to Modify Restraining Order
  17. Order Received for Signature Comment (Pending Hearing) Order on Request to Modify Restraning Order
  18. Order filed Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Comment Denying Request to Modify Restraining Order
  19. Notice of Hearing Comment Changing Dept. 404 to Dept. 97D

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more