Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-14
Status Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Fast Track Child Custody
Docket 51 entries
Disposition dismissed

Docket Entries

  1. Filing Fee Paid. $250.00 from Jones & LoBello. Check no. 1226. (SC)
  2. Filed Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) (SEALED) (SC)
  3. Issued Notice to File Case Appeal Statement/Civil. Due date: 7 days. (SC)
  4. Issued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. (SC)
  5. Filed Appellant's Case Appeal Statement. (SC)
  6. Issued Notice: Exemption from Settlement Program. It has been determined that this appeal will not be assigned to the settlement program. Appellants: 14 days transcript request form; 40 days fast track statement and appendix. (SC)
  7. Filed Appellants Notice of Request for Transcript of Proceedings. (REJECTED PER NOTICE) (SC)
  8. Issued Notice of Rejection of Deficient Transcript Request. (SC)
  9. Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 10/5/22. To Court Reporter: Transcript Video Services. (SC)
  10. Filed Docketing Statement - Civil Appeals. (SC).
  11. Filed Appellant's Motion for Stay. (SC).
  12. Filed Substitution of Attorney for Respondent (Emily McFarling and Michael Burton to replace Kimber Laux). (SC).
  13. Filed Notice from Court Reporter. Maria Balagtas stating that the requested transcripts were delivered. Dates of transcripts: 10/05/22. (SC).
  14. Filed Order to Show Cause. Appellants shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Respondents may file any reply within 14 days from the date that appellants response is served. Briefing is suspended. (SC)
  15. Filed Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. (SC)
  16. Filed Order Reinstating Briefing and Granting Motion for Stay. Appellant shall have 21 days from the date of this order to file and serve the fast track statement and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed as set forth in NRAP 3E. Appellant has filed a motion to stay the district court's order pending disposition of this appeal. The motion is granted. The district court's order entered November 14, 2022, shall be stayed pending further order of this court. (SC)
  17. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's fast track and appendix due: May 1, 2023. (SC)
  18. Filed Appellant's Motion to Extend Time to File Fast Track Brief. (SC)
  19. Filed Appellant's Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File Fast Track Brief. (SC)
  20. Filed Order Granting Motions. Appellant shall have until May 8, 2023, to file and serve the fast track statement and appendix. (SC)
  21. Filed Appellant's Fast Track Statement - Child Custody. (SC)
  22. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Fast Track Statement - Vol. 1. (SC)
  23. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Fast Track Statement - Vol. 2. (SC)
  24. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Fast Track Statement - Vol. 3. (SC)
  25. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Fast Track Statement - Vol. 4. (SC)
  26. Filed Respondent's Motion for Remand for Limited Purpose (REJECTED PER PHONE CALL WITH BR). (SC)
  27. Filed Respondent's Motion for Limited Remand for Limited Purpose. (SC).
  28. Filed Respondent's Fast Track Response. (SC)
  29. Filed Respondent's Appendix to Fast Track Response. (SC)
  30. Filed Appellant's Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Remand for Limited Purpose. (SC)
  31. Filed Order of Limited Remand. Respondent has filed a motion for a limited remand. The motion for remand is granted. This appeal is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of holding an evidentiary hearing on respondent's motion to modify custody and appellant's objections to the parenting coordinator's 4th and 5th Report and Recommendations. District court's written order due: 60 days. Briefing suspended. (SC)
  32. Filed Appellant's Stipulation and Order. (SC)
  33. Filed Appellant's Motion to Extend Time for Decision on Remand. (SC)
  34. Filed Order Granting Motion. District court order due: December 1, 2023. The briefing schedule shall remain suspended pending further order of this court. (SC)
  35. Filed Notice of Association of Counsel (Michael Burton as counsel for Respondent) (SC)
  36. Filed Respondent's Motion to Confirm Remand Orders. (SC).
  37. Filed Appendix in Support Respondent's Motion to Confirm Remand Orders. (SC).
  38. Filed Appellant opposition to respondent's Motion to Confirm Remand Orders and Countermotion t o Confirm stay of District Court Proceedings. REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 09-21-2023(SC)
  39. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document.(Reply to Answer to Petition)(SC)
  40. Filed Appellant opposition to respondent's Motion to Confirm Remand Orders and Countermotion to Confirm stay of District Court Proceedings. (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 9/26/23) (SC)
  41. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (SC)
  42. Filed Order to Show Cause. Appellants shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Respondents may file any reply within 14 days from the date that appellants' response is served. The appeal in Docket No. 85802 is currently on remand to the district court for the limited purpose of holding an evidentiary hearing on respondent's motion to modify custody and appellant's objections to the parenting coordinator's fourth and fifth report and recommendations. Appellant's filing of a notice of appeal in Docket No. 87269 does not affect the district court's ability to proceed on limited remand as directed in this court's June 1 and July 28, 2023, orders entered in Docket No. 85802. Respondent's motions and opposed emergency motion to confirm remand orders are granted. The deadlines for filing documents in Docket No. 87269 shall be suspended and the briefing schedule in Docket No. 85802 shall remain suspended pending further order of this court. fn1[Appellant's opposition to the emergency motion filed in Docket No. 87269 is 13 pages and respondent's reply is 18 pages. The parties are reminded of this court's rules regarding page limits for motions, responses, and replies filed in this court. NRAP 27(d)(2) ("A motion or a response to a motion shall not exceed 10 pages, unless the court permits or directs otherwise. A reply to a response shall not exceed 5 pages."). Neither party received permission to file oversized pleadings in this matter. In the future, such documents will be rejected.] (SC)
  43. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's response to order to show cause due: November 13, 2023. (SC)
  44. Filed District court order. Certified copy of order filed in district court on Response to Supreme Court Orders dated 12-01-2023 - D588522(SC)
  45. Filed Motion Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e) Respondent's Motion to Confirm District Court's December 1, 2023 Order or in the Alternative to Confirm Remand(SC)
  46. Filed Respondent's Reply to Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause.(SC)
  47. Filed Appellant's Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Confirm District Court's December 1, 2023, Order or In The Alternative to Confirm Remand and Countermotion for Stay of The Order Until Appeal are Resolved. (SC)
  48. Filed Respondent's Reply to Appellant's Opposition to Respondents Motion to Confirm District Court's December 1, 2023 Order, or in the Alternative to Confirm Remand and Opposition to Appellant's Countermotion for Stay of The Order Until Appeal are Resolved.(SC)
  49. Filed Order Dismissing Appeals. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." fn1[Although respondent sought relief by December 12, 2023, he provided no basis for seeking relief by that particular date.] fn2[Appellant filed a response in Docket No. 87269, in which she expressly "recognizes this Court's mootness analysis related to the first appeal," but she did not file a separate response in the first appeal, Docket No. 85802. We note that appellant has also filed a notice of appeal from the December 1 order, Docket No. 87770.] fn3[ In light of this order, our April 3 stay is dissolved and appellant's countermotion for stay is denied, as is any other relief requested in the parties' papers.] NNP23-EC/KP/LB (SC)
  50. Issued Remittitur. (SC)
  51. Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more