Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-30
Status Closed
Type Civil District Court (1 Ke)|Debt Collection
Docket 14 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff City Of Saxman
Defendant Boggs, Tanner|Laird, Scott
Photo of Hon. Miller, Kevin G

Judge

Hon. Miller, Kevin G

Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. atisfaction of Judgment Attorney: Brandt-Erichsen, Scott A (8811175) City of Saxman (Plaintiff);
  2. omplaint for Debt Collection Receipt: 1918004 Date: 11/30/2021
  3. ummons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. ttorney Information Attorney Brandt-Erichsen, Scott A representing Plaintiff City of Saxman as of 11/30/2021 City of Saxman (Plaintiff);
  5. ntry of Appearance Attorney: Brandt-Erichsen, Scott A (8811175) City of Saxman (Plaintiff);
  6. eturn of Service - Summons Served On: 12/13/21 by Clyde Pasterski Tanner Boggs (Defendant);
  7. eturn of Service - Summons Served On: 1/30/22 @ 15:00 by Clyde Pasterski Scott Laird (Defendant);
  8. pplication for Entry of Default (Motion) Attorney: Brandt-Erichsen, Scott A (8811175) City of Saxman (Plaintiff); Filing Party: City of Saxman Case Motion #1
  9. rder Granting Motion City of Saxman Case Motion #1 - Application for Entry of Default (Motion)
  10. efault Judgment for Plaintiff Granted by Judge
  11. udgment Entered Default Judgment Amount: 8,988.44 Pre-Default Judgment Interest: 527.17 Attorney Fees: 898.84 Court Costs: 0.00 Other Fees: 288.46 Default Judgment Total: 10,702.91 Total Accrued Costs: 0.00 Total Accrued Interest: 0.00 Terms: 3.25 Type: Default Judgment Judge: Miller, Kevin G Default Judgment Date: 03/22/2022 Default Judgment Time: 12:00PM Referee: Recommendation Date: Default Judgment Status: Judgment Entered Default Judgment For: City of Saxman - Plaintiff Default Judgment Against: Boggs, Tanner - Defendant ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Laird, Scott - Defendant ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Default Judgment Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Default Judgment Balance: 10,702.91 Case Total: 0.00 Case Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Case Balance: 0.00
  12. irect Payment Made Receipt: 1952644 Date: 04/01/2022
  13. eason for Returned Mail: Insufficient Address Date Returned Documents Were Distributed: 3/25/22 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved: Entry of Default/Default Judgment Scott Laird (Defendant);
  14. ivil Disbursement to: City of Saxman

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more