Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Escambia County

Court

Escambia County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-31
Status REOPEN ACTIVE - 12/28/2023
Type Other Circuit Civil
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Davis, Joseph Michael
Defendant Shackelford Circuit Judge, Jan|Robinson Circuit Judge, Coleman Lee|Madden State Attorney, Ginger Bowden
Photo of Hon. / FRYDRYCHOWICZ , JENNIFER J

Judge

Hon. / FRYDRYCHOWICZ , JENNIFER J

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED 05/31/2023 CASE NUMBER 2023 CA 001956
  2. OTION TO STAY ANY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
  3. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDEREATION
  4. RDER ADJUDICATING PLAINTIFF TO BE AN INDIGENT PRISONER, IMPOSING LIEN ON PLAINTIFFS INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT, DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 57.085 FLORIDA STATUTES AND DISMISSING ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS IN THIS CAUSE AS MOOT - RECORDED (OR.9077.133. / 2023096302)
  5. ETTER TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INMATE BANK
  6. MENDED COMPLAINT
  7. NOTICE OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
  8. CASE CLOSED
  9. ORDER ADJUDICATING PLAINTIFF TO BE AN INDIGENT PRISONER, IMPOSING LIEN ON PLAINTIFFS INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT, DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 57.085 FLORIDA STATUTES AND DISMISSING ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS IN THIS CAUSE AS MOOT
  10. PRO SE MOTION TO STRIKE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  11. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  12. ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE MOTION TO RULE ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ALL JUDGES IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST MOOT
  13. CORRESPONDENCE OF JOSEPH MICHAEL DAVIS
  14. COPY OF MOTION TO RULE ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ALL JUDGES IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST SENT DOWN FROM JUDGES OFFICE
  15. MOTION TO RULE ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ALL JUDGES IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST
  16. ORDER DENYING PRO SE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ALL FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT JUDGES
  17. ORDER DENYING PRO SE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ALL FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT JUDGES
  18. PRO SE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ALL JUDGES IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND REQUEST FOR NEUTRAL AND DETACHED MAGISTRATE FROM A DIFFERENT CIRCUIT BE APPOINTED Y THE FIRST FROM A DIFFERENT CIRCUIT BE APPOINTED BY THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL TO PRESIDE OVER CIVIL CASE IN SUPPORT THE PLAINTIFF STATES THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT OF FACTS
  19. FRYDRYCHOWICZ, JENNIFER J: ASSIGNED
  20. ORDER OF RECUSAL -REASSIGNED TO DIVISION N
  21. MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND REQUEST FOR NEUTRAL JUDGE TO BE APPOINTED FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT
  22. CORRESPONDENCE FILED
  23. CHECKLIST FOR INDIGENT PRISONER
  24. BRODERSEN, AMY P.: ASSIGNED
  25. COPY OF ENVELOPE
  26. PRISONER APPLICATION FOR INDIGENT STATUS
  27. COMPLAINT
  28. CORRESPONDENCE FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more