Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-03
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 90 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Newrez Llc Dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Defendant Unknown Heirs At Law, Devisees, Legatees, Administrators, And Executors Of The Estate Of Rudolph W. Jackson Aka Rudolph Jackson, Deceased|Unknown Heirs At Law, Devisees, Legatees, Administrators, And Executors Of The Estate Of Joann Jackson, Deceased|Barron Pringle|Nicole Pringle|Marlene Pringle|Rudolph R. Pringle|Dorothy Law|Melvin D. Law
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 51439365 RETURNED 08/28/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439371) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MELVIN D. LAW 3505 MONTROSE AVE. RICHMOND, VA 23222
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439370) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: DOROTHY LAW 3505 MONTROSE AVE. RICHMOND, VA 23222
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439369) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RUDOLPH R. PRINGLE 3703 GREENVIEW DR. MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439368) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MARLENE PRINGLE 3703 GREENVIEW DR. MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044
  7. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439367) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: BARRON PRINGLE 6320 MAPLEWOOD ROAD UNIT K103 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44124
  8. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439366) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND 4125 EAST 154TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  9. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439365) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND 4125 EAST 154TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  10. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439364) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NICOLE PRINGLE [email protected]
  11. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439363) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TED A HUMBERT [email protected]
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(51439362) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TED A HUMBERT [email protected]
  13. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED 07/21/2023, IS GRANTED. CASE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. ORRESPONDENCE TO THE CLERK OF COURTS FILED. PRO SE (9999999) BARRON PRINGLE
  15. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50991767 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/19/2023 PRINGLE/BARRON/ PROCESSED BY COC 07/26/2023.
  16. OTION TO DISMISS FILED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS 08/21/2023 - GRANTED
  17. UMS COMPLAINT(50991767) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BARRON PRINGLE 6320 MAPLEWOOD ROAD UNIT K103 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44124
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REISSUE CERTIFIED MAIL - COMPLAINT
  21. EGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  22. ROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $631.40- LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  23. RE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $381.40
  24. NSWER FILED BY D4 NICOLE PRINGLE ATTORNEY PRO SE 9999999 ANSWER TO SUMMONS
  25. UMS COMPLAINT(50759843) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NICOLE PRINGLE 6320 MAPLEWOOD ROAD UNIT K103 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44124 ANSWER DATE: 06/29/2023
  26. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. RIT FEE
  28. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  29. FFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE VIA PUBLICATION
  30. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REISSUE OF ORDINARY MAIL -COMPLAINT
  31. UMS COMPLAINT(50702091) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NICOLE PRINGLE 57 CHARLESTON SQUARE CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000 ANSWER DATE: 06/21/2023
  32. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50542697 RETURNED 5/24/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PRINGLE/NICOLE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  33. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. RIT FEE
  35. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50542702 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/15/2023 LAW/MELVIN/D. PROCESSED BY COC 05/24/2023.
  36. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50542701 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/15/2023 LAW/DOROTHY/ PROCESSED BY COC 05/24/2023.
  37. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50542698 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/18/2023 PRINGLE/NICOLE/ PROCESSED BY COC 05/24/2023.
  38. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50542695 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/18/2023 PRINGLE/BARRON/ PROCESSED BY COC 05/24/2023.
  39. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REISSUE OF ORDINARY MAIL -COMPLAINT
  40. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50542696 RETURNED 5/20/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PRINGLE/NICOLE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  41. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50542700 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/09/2023 PRINGLE/RUDOLPH/R. PROCESSED BY COC 05/17/2023.
  42. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50542699 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/13/2023 PRINGLE/MARLENE/ PROCESSED BY COC 05/17/2023.
  43. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50542694 RETURNED 05/12/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PRINGLE/BARRON/ - RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  44. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50542693 RETURNED 5/8/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND - VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  45. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50542692 RETURNED 5/8/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND - VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  46. UMS COMPLAINT(50542702) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MELVIN D. LAW 3505 MONTROSE AVE. RICHMOND, VA 23222
  47. UMS COMPLAINT(50542701) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DOROTHY LAW 3505 MONTROSE AVE. RICHMOND, VA 23222
  48. UMS COMPLAINT(50542700) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RUDOLPH R. PRINGLE 3703 GREENVIEW DR. MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044
  49. UMS COMPLAINT(50542699) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARLENE PRINGLE 3703 GREENVIEW DR. MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044
  50. UMS COMPLAINT(50542698) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NICOLE PRINGLE 2117 BRANDYWINE DR CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000
  51. UMS COMPLAINT(50542697) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NICOLE PRINGLE 6320 MAPLEWOOD ROAD UNIT K103 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44124
  52. UMS COMPLAINT(50542696) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NICOLE PRINGLE 57 CHARLESTON SQUARE CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000
  53. UMS COMPLAINT(50542695) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BARRON PRINGLE 2117 BRANDYWINE DRIVE CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000
  54. UMS COMPLAINT(50542694) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BARRON PRINGLE 6320 MAPLEWOOD ROAD UNIT K103 MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44124
  55. UMS COMPLAINT(50542693) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND 4125 EAST 154TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  56. UMS COMPLAINT(50542692) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN HEIRS AT LAW, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, AND 4125 EAST 154TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  57. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  58. RIT FEE
  59. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  60. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  61. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  62. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  63. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  64. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  65. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  67. RIT FEE
  68. RIT FEE
  69. RIT FEE
  70. RIT FEE
  71. RIT FEE
  72. RIT FEE
  73. RIT FEE
  74. RIT FEE
  75. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  76. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  77. RIT FEE
  78. RIT FEE
  79. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  80. AGISTRATE JIM L JACKSON ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  81. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  82. UDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  83. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  84. EGAL RESEARCH
  85. EGAL NEWS
  86. EGAL AID
  87. OMPUTER FEE
  88. LERK'S FEE
  89. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT
  90. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TED A HUMBERT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more