Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-17
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Citibank, N.a.
Defendant Fnu Ismail
Photo of Hon. Mark R Majer

Judge

Hon. Mark R Majer

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. EFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO STENGER & STENGER P.C.
  3. UMS COMPLAINT(49170461) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FNU ISMAIL 7957 PAMELA DR NORTH ROYALTON, OH 44133-0000
  4. RIT FEE
  5. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  6. RAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE FOR CERTIFIED SERVICE
  7. LAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. PURSUANT TO RULE 4(E) THE COURT DISMISSES THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. COSTS TO PLAINTIFF. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  8. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 11/22/2022 AT 10:45 AM IS CANCELLED.
  9. LAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY PHONE RESET ON 11/22/22 AT 10:45 A.M. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 11/22/2022 AT 10:45 AM.
  11. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 10/04/2022 AT 10:15 AM IS CANCELLED.
  12. LAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY PHONE SET FOR 10/4/22 AT 10:15 A.M. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 10/04/2022 AT 10:15 AM.
  14. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 08/24/2022 AT 10:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  15. ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 8/24/22 AT 10:30 A.M. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 08/24/2022 AT 10:30 AM.
  17. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47568873 RETURNED 06/06/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ISMAIL/FNU/ - VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  18. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47568873 RETURNED 6/6/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ISMAIL/FNU/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  19. UMS COMPLAINT(47568873) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FNU ISMAIL 1539 ALAMEDA AVE LAKEWOOD, OH 44107
  20. RIT FEE
  21. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. UDGE MARK R MAJER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  23. EGAL RESEARCH
  24. EGAL NEWS
  25. EGAL AID
  26. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  27. OMPUTER FEE
  28. LERK'S FEE
  29. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ANTHONY HUSPASKA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more