Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-01
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 31 entries
Disposition uncontested

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Castro, Marcos
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer freeman, Amythest

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer freeman, Amythest

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Paternity
  4. Income and Expense Declaration
  5. Proof of Service
  6. Return Letter Comment The attached Unfiled and Defective Answer is being for the following reason(s): The Answer submitted is defective and incomplete. The Answer is missing the complete mailing address of the party filing, in the caption area of the upper left hand corner. Section 5 of the Answer is incomplete. Section 5 did not provide the complete mailing address and information of the Respondent, Marcos Castro. Section 6 of the Answer was defective as you are unable to provide the service upon the Dept. of Child Support Services. Please refer to section 6 for service information. If you choose to file the Answer to Complaint or Supplemental Complaint Regarding Parental Obligations with the Court you may want to seek legal advice and or assistance.
  7. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Return Letter and unfiled Answer was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on 11.09.2021. Parties served: Marcos Castro 1424 W. Magnolia Avenue Reedley, CA 93654
  8. Request to Enter Default
  9. Proposed Documents
  10. Declaration for Default or Uncontested Judgment
  11. Proof of Service by Mail
  12. Return Letter Comment NOM Simp Mod CS, I&E and Req FW returned to Respondent
  13. Notice of Motion Comment and Motion for Simplified Modification of Order for Child Support / HRG: @1:15pm Dept 302
  14. Income and Expense Declaration
  15. Waiver of court fees and costs granted by operation of law
  16. Responsive Declaration Comment to Motion for Simplified Mod of Order for Child, Spousal, or Family Support.
  17. Income and Expense Declaration Comment w/ tax attachment.
  18. Responsive Declaration Comment HRG: in Dept. 302 @ 1:15pm
  19. Proof of Service by Mail
  20. Motion Modify Child Support Judicial Officer Freeman, Amythest Hearing Time 1:15 PM Result Heard
  21. Commissioner Hamilton Minute Order. See attached.
  22. Income and Expense Declaration
  23. Comment w/ tax attachment.
  24. Responsive Declaration
  25. Comment HRG: in Dept. 302 @ 1:15pm
  26. Proof of Service by Mail
  27. Motion Modify Child Support
  28. Judicial Officer Freeman, Amythest
  29. Hearing Time 1:15 PM
  30. Result Heard
  31. Commissioner Hamilton Minute Order. See attached.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more