Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-26
Status ACTSEAL - ACTIVE/RECORD SEALED
Type Dh Dhs Juvenile Appeal
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cody, Catherine Elizabeth|Lanford, Leah Beth|Potter, Jacob Stem
Defendant Tave, Demarcus D|Mcclain, Dana K|Arkansas Department Of Human Services|Minor Child|Howard, Ellen Kathryn

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate court coversheet.
  3. No Images
  4. RECORD LODGED
  5. E-filed record. Pleadings: 1 volume; 130 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 60 pages. No physical exhibits. Record sealed pursuant R. 6-9/6-10.
  6. No Images
  7. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  8. none.
  9. No Images
  10. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  11. Appellant's brief due June 25, 2023.
  12. BRIEFING NOTICE
  13. ACTIVE/RECORD SEALED
  14. Record sealed pursuant R. 6-9/6-10.
  15. No Images
  16. RECUSAL
  17. none.
  18. No Images
  19. NO MERIT BRIEF FILED
  20. Appellant's No Merit Brief e-filed by attorney.
  21. No Images
  22. MOTION WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  23. Motion of Leah Lanford to withdraw as counsel on appeal.
  24. No Images
  25. LETT TO APPLLNT 30 DAYS TO RES
  26. Motion of Leah Lanford to withdraw as counsel on appeal, no merit brief, and letter stating pro se points are due July 27, 2023 mailed to appellant's address of record provided by counsel.
  27. No Images
  28. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  29. No merit packet to appellant returned this date: "Return to sender/Not Delieverable as addressed/Unable to forward"
  30. No Images
  31. LETT TO APPLLNT 30 DAYS TO RES
  32. Motion of Leah Lanford to withdraw as counsel on appeal, no merit brief, and letter stating pro se points are due August 31, 2023 re-mailed to appellant's address of record provided by counsel.
  33. LETTER
  34. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  35. Mail to appellant Catherine Cody returned undeliverable "Return to sender/attempted - not known/unable to forward/return to sender"
  36. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.