Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Las Vegas Township Justice Court

Court

Las Vegas Township Justice Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-07
Status Closed
Type Civil Writ Of Possession
Docket 21 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Tbd Restaurants Llc
Defendant M&i Asset Management Company|Marketon Real Estate Llc
Photo of Hon. De La Garza Melisa

Judge

Hon. De La Garza Melisa

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 2 years
  2. Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 5 years
  3. Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 4(i)
  4. Civil Writ of Possession Complaint - $2,500.01 - $5000 PLAINTIFFS VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR REENTRY OF COMMERCIAL LEASE PREMISES PER NRS 118C.210.
  5. Documents in Support DECLARATION OF MR. JACOB JTCHAMANIAN IN SUPPORT OF: PLAINTIFFS VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR REENTRY OF COMMERCIAL LEASE PREMISES PER NRS 118C.210.
  6. Order Setting Hearing Order Setting Hearing
  7. Supplement to Motion TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL RULING RE: MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY PROPERTY AS AGAINST V & H PIZZA 1: 765 N. NELLIS BLVD., STE. 10, LAS VEGAS, NV 89110 MOTION TO TERMINATE AUTOMATIC STAY WITH RESPECT TO COMMERCIAL LEASE PREMISES DUE TO TERMINATION BEFORE THE HONORABLE AUGUST B. LANDIS UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT JUDGE; WITH HIGHLIGHTS SUPPLIED BY PLAINTIFF
  8. Motion PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION FOR: AN EX PARTE ORDER SETTING A HEARING FOR TENANT TO GIVE AN ORAL OATH ALLEGING AN UNLAWFUL LOCKOUT FROM ITS LEASE PREMISES PER NRS 118C.210(2); AN EX PARTE ORDER REQUIRING TENANT TO POST A BOND EQUAL TO ONE MONTHS RENT; AND AN EX PARTE ORDER GRANTING TENANT A TEMPORAY WRIT OF RESTITUTION AND SETTING HEARING TO DECIDE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF RESTITUTION.
  9. Civil Prove Up (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer De La Garza, Melisa) Plaintiff's Complaint for Verified Reentry of Commercial Lease Premises per NRS 118C.210 Result: Motion Granted
  10. Order Order Requiring Plaintiff to Post Bond With the Court Clerk and for Related Relief
  11. Civil Summons Issued (Efiling)
  12. Ex Parte EX PARTE ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF TEMPORARY WRIT OF RESTITUTION AND SETTING A HEARING TO DECIDE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR RESTITUTION
  13. Answer Answer and Opposition to Plaintiff's Verified Complained for Reentry of Commercial Lease Premises Per NRS 118C.210
  14. Notice Notice of Appearance
  15. Reply to Opposition PLAINTIFFS REPLY DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO COMPLAINT FOR REINSTATEMENT
  16. Civil Prove Up (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer De La Garza, Melisa) Continued - Plaintiff's Complaint for Verified Reentry of Commerical Lease Premises Per NRS 118C.210 Result: Matter Heard
  17. Order Order After Hearing
  18. Proof of Service NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER AFTER HEARING
  19. Refund Check Processed TO PLAINTIFF TBD RESTAURANTS OR ATTORNEY
  20. Start Time Tracking: Projected Return - 90 days Plaintiff Exhibits
  21. Exhibit Retention Period Expired Plaintiff Exhibits

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more