Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Windham County

Court

Windham County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-25
Type C 00 Contracts Construction All Other
Docket 42 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kai Kunz
Defendant Interlock Industries

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 6/22/2023 HON KAREN DEMEOLA
  6. ORDER RESULT: Granted 6/22/2023 HON KAREN DEMEOLA
  7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD (Second) RESULT: Granted 8/22/2023 HON KAREN DEMEOLA
  8. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/22/2023 HON KAREN DEMEOLA
  9. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  10. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  11. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  12. SCHEDULING ORDER
  13. NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Interrogatories and Requests for Production Directed to the Plaintiff
  14. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9) RESULT: Order 6/18/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  15. RDER RESULT: Order 6/18/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  16. OTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER
  17. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  18. RDER RESULT: Order 7/31/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  19. OTICE of Service of Requests for Admissions
  20. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/21/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  21. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/21/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  22. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 8/21/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  23. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/21/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  24. OTION FOR ORDER Motion for Order Deeming Requests for Admissions Directed to Plaintiff
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 11/29/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  26. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 11/29/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  27. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/29/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  28. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  29. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF RESULT: Granted 2/19/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  30. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/19/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  31. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 2/25/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  32. RDER RESULT: Off 2/24/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  33. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/25/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  34. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  35. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION
  36. EQUEST Request to Amend Answer and Special Defenses
  37. MENDED ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Amended Answer and Special Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint
  38. MENDED ANSWER Redlined Amended Answer and Special Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint
  39. XHIBITS Corrected Exhibits In Support of MSJ Docket No. 117.00 RESULT: Withdrawn 4/3/2025 BY THE DEFENDANT
  40. EPLY Reply to Plaintiff's Objection to Motion for Summary Judgment
  41. ITHDRAWAL IN PART re: Entry #125.00 Corrected Exhibits
  42. XHIBITS Corrected Exhibits in Support of the MSJ Entry #117.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more