Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Santa Fe

Court

Santa Fe

New Mexico

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-25
Status CLS: JUDGMENT/ DISPOSITION
Type Declaratory Relief
Docket 83 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Otero Office Plaza Condominium Owners Association, Inc.|Mcgown William|Enchanted Elevations Property Management, Llc|The Naz Family Revocable Living Trust
Defendant Thayer Sally|Dukette James|Mcgown William|Enchanted Elevations Property Management, Llc|The Thomas T. Dukette Special Needs Trust|The Naz Family Revocable Living Trust|Mak Daddy Duff Llc|Maestas Nick|Maestas Rose
Photo of Hon. Wilson Matthew Justin

Judge

Hon. Wilson Matthew Justin

Santa Fe County (NM)

New Mexico

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. RANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENT
  2. EQUEST
  3. LS: ORDER, APPLICATION, PETITION OR MOTION GRANTED
  4. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  5. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  6. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  7. EPLY
  8. ESPONSE
  9. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  10. TN: MOTION
  11. TN: to Exceed Page Limit
  12. RD: STIPULATED
  13. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  14. TN: TO VACATE
  15. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  16. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  17. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  18. EPLY
  19. ESPONSE
  20. ITNESS LIST
  21. ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  22. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  23. TN: FOR DISMISSAL OF PARTIES
  26. NSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
  27. RD: GRANTING LEAVE
  28. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  29. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  30. TN: Motion to Extend Dates in Scheduling Order
  31. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  32. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  33. EPLY
  34. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  35. ESPONSE
  36. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  37. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  38. EPLY
  39. RD: ORDER DENYING
  40. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  41. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  42. EPLY
  43. TN: FOR LEAVE
  44. ESPONSE
  45. ESPONSE
  46. ismissal of Party, Not of Case
  47. TN: TO WITHDRAW
  48. TN: MOTION
  49. TN: FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  50. RD: RULE 16B SCHEDULING/FORM
  51. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  52. TN: MOTION/ PETITION TO EXTEND TIME
  53. EPORT
  54. TC: HEARING (SCHEDULING CONFERENCE)
  55. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  56. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  57. CJ: DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  58. TC: HEARING
  59. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  60. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  61. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  62. NSWER
  63. RD: WITHDRAWAL/ SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  64. TN: MOTION/APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  65. ERTIFICATE AS TO THE STATE OF THE RECORD
  66. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  67. TN: MOTION
  68. ITHDRAWAL/ ENTRY/ SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  69. TN: MOTION
  70. ESPONSE
  71. RD: EXTENDING TIME
  72. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  73. TN: FOR CONTINUANCE
  74. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  75. TN: MOTION/ PETITION TO EXTEND TIME
  76. UMMONS RETURN
  77. UMMONS RETURN
  78. UMMONS RETURN
  79. UMMONS RETURN
  80. ERTIFICATE/ PROOF OF MAILING
  81. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  82. DG: JUDGE EXCUSAL/PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more