Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-09
Type Cc Adult Abuse Stalking
Docket 23 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Acting Pro Se
Defendant King, Matthew Thomas
Photo of Hon. Rhoades Anna Christine

Judge

Hon. Rhoades Anna Christine

McDonald County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Auto Renwl Sub Electronically Automatic extension submitted Electronically
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. Ord of Prot Returned Non-Est Document ID - 23-AFOP-139; Served To - KING, MATTHEW THOMAS; Server - ; Served Date - 04-OCT-23; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Non-est; Service Text - Unable to make contact
  5. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  6. Sound Recording Log Sheet
  7. JFULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  8. Default Judgment
  9. Full Order of Protection Document ID: 23-AFOP-139, for KING, MATTHEW THOMAS. Emailed & Delivered to NCSO for service. Petitioner handed copy Full Order in effect until 05/25/2026 with the option of renewal every three years.
  10. Judmt Full Order Protection Judgment for Petitioner and Against Respondent.
  11. Adult Abuse Hearing Held Petitioner Pro Se. Respondent failed to appear. Full Order Judgment entered. ACR Associated Entries: 05/09/2023 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 05/25/2023; 9:00 AM; ANNA CHRISTINE RHOADES; Newton
  12. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  13. Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 23-AEOP-265; Served To - KING, MATTHEW THOMAS; Server - HAYES, BILL; Served Date - 15-MAY-23; Served Time - 13:24:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 23-AEOP-265; Served To - KING, MATTHEW T; Server - [Not Provided]; Served Date - 15-May-2023; Served Time - 12:20:00; Service Type - EE; Reason Description - Served
  16. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  17. Proposed Judmt/Dec Dis Filed Document ID: 23-AFOP-139, for KING, MATTHEW THOMAS.
  18. OEXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
  19. ExParte Order of Protection Document ID: 23-AEOP-265, for KING, MATTHEW THOMAS. Petitioner handed copies Emailed & Delivered to NCSO for service.
  20. Ex Parte Order Issued Document ID: 23-AEOP-265, for KING, MATTHEW THOMAS.
  21. Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 05/25/2023 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 05/25/2023; 9:00 AM; ANNA CHRISTINE RHOADES; Newton
  22. Confid Dom Rel Info File Sheet
  23. Pet for Protection Ord Filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more