Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Litchfield County

Court

Litchfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-12
Type T 90 Torts All Other
Docket 41 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Natalie Llamas
Defendant Stephen Fung Fook

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE S. FUNG-FOOK
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 7/25/2023 BY THE CLERK
  6. ORDER RESULT: Denied 7/25/2023 BY THE CLERK
  7. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/29/2023 HON ANN LYNCH
  8. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  9. REQUEST TO REVISE Request to Revise Defendant's Special Defense
  10. MOTION FOR ORDER re: Defendant's Filings RESULT: Granted 10/25/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  11. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/25/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  12. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/19/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  13. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/19/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  14. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD re Failure to Revise 09/08/23 Special Defense RESULT: Granted 2/15/2024 BY THE CLERK
  15. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/15/2024 BY THE CLERK
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/15/2024 BY THE CLERK
  17. TATEMENT OF CLAIM Claim for Hearing in Damages
  18. OTICE re: Update to Certification Page
  19. PPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS RESULT: Order 9/5/2024 HON ANN LYNCH
  20. OTION IN LIMINE re: Special Defense
  21. RIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT Plaintiff's Trial Management Report
  22. RDER RESULT: Order 9/18/2024 HON ANN LYNCH
  23. RIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT Plaintiff's Trial Management Report
  24. OTION IN LIMINE re: Defendant's Special Defenses RESULT: Withdrawn 2/5/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 1/30/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  26. RDER RESULT: Order 1/30/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  27. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  28. OTION IN LIMINE re: Defendant's Evidence Presented at Trial
  29. IST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  30. EMORANDUM
  31. IST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  32. EMORANDUM Plaintiff's Pretrial Memorandum
  33. TIPULATION Joint Stipulation re: Facts and Evidence
  34. OTION FOR ORDER re: July 12, 2024, Order of Protection
  35. EQUEST TO BRING AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURTHOUSE (JD-CL-90) RESULT: Granted 2/13/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  36. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/13/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  37. RDER RESULT: Order 4/8/2025 HON MATTHEW LAROCK
  38. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE I am working days now from 8am-5pm I would like to ask to extend it to 7/2 or any dates after M-F RESULT: Granted 5/30/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  39. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/30/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  40. BJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Defendant's Motion for Continuance
  41. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re: Plaintiff's Objection to Motion for Continuance

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more