Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-09
Type Discrimination
Docket 33 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Smith, Darmetrice
Defendant Punjob Farms Inc.
Photo of Hon. ALISON E MCCARTY

Judge

Hon. ALISON E MCCARTY

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER - SPEARS
  2. CA-30987 COURT OF APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
  3. CA-30987 NOTICE OF APPEAL
  4. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed PUNJOB FARMS INC.
  5. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DEAN KONSTAND
  6. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DARMETRICE SMITH
  7. THIS COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT PUNJOB FARMS, INC’S CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSES THE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT. THE COURT HEREBY DENIES PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THIS IS A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER. AEM
  8. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed PUNJOB FARMS INC.
  9. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DEAN KONSTAND
  10. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DARMETRICE SMITH
  11. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. PUNJOB FARMS INC.
  12. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. KONSTAND, DEAN
  13. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. SMITH, DARMETRICE
  14. DEFENDANT'S WITNESS LIST
  15. REPLY BRIEF
  16. AFFIDAVIT OF DEAN KONSTAND
  17. MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER
  18. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF TO OPPOSITION BRIEF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  19. DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  20. AFFIDAVIT OF SUKHJINDER SINGH
  21. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DARMETRICE SMITH
  22. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DARMETRICE SMITH
  23. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE. TRIAL DATE: JANUARY 11, 2024, AT 9:00 A.M. FINAL PRETRIAL DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2023, AT 1:00 P.M., IN-PERSON. THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS LEAVE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE THEIR BRIEF IN OPPOSITION OR CROSS-MOTION BY SEPTEMBER 29, 2023. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE THEIR BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO ANY CROSS-MOTION BY OCTOBER 27, 2023. ANY REPLIES SHALL BE FILED BY NOVEMBER 3, 2023. AEM
  24. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING SMITH, DARMETRICE
  25. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  26. A FIRST PRETRIAL CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE ON AUGUST 14, 2023 AT 9:00 A.M. THE PARTIES SHALL PARTICIPATE IN THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE BY CALLING THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE LINE. AEM
  27. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM FILED
  28. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY DEAN KONSTAND AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
  29. LEAVE TO PLEAD
  30. Certified Mail Service - Served PUNJOB FARMS INC.
  31. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail PUNJOB FARMS INC.
  32. CASE DESIGNATION FORM.
  33. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more