Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-09
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ford Motor Credit Company Llc
Defendant Camille Brown
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(51983873) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CAMILLE BROWN 130 E 219TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(51983872) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(51983871) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(51983870) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PAUL K. RODE [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(51983869) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PAUL K. RODE [email protected]
  7. URSUANT TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL, THIS MATTER IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COSTS TO PLAINTIFF. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. OTICE FILED BY P1 FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC ATTORNEY MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ 0083216 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  9. UDGMENT ENTRY(51139819) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CAMILLE BROWN 130 E 219TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  10. UDGMENT ENTRY(51139818) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ [email protected]
  11. UDGMENT ENTRY(51139817) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ [email protected]
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(51139816) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PAUL K. RODE [email protected]
  13. UDGMENT ENTRY(51139815) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PAUL K. RODE [email protected]
  14. HE COURT BEING ADVISED THAT DEFENDANT CAMILLE BROWN HAS FILED A BANKRUPTCY PETITION WITH THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO (CASE NO. 23-11788-JPS), PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE ARE STAYED. 11 U.S.C. 362. CASE IS REMOVED FROM THE ACTIVE DOCKET. CASE WILL BE RETURNED TO THE PENDING DOCKET ONLY UPON MOTION. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC ATTORNEY PAUL K. RODE 0080911 SUGGESTION OF STAY
  16. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50591278 RETURNED 5/30/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BROWN/CAMILLE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  17. UMS COMPLAINT(50591278) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CAMILLE BROWN 130 E 219TH ST EUCLID, OH 44123
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. UDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  21. EGAL RESEARCH
  22. EGAL NEWS
  23. EGAL AID
  24. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  25. OMPUTER FEE
  26. LERK'S FEE
  27. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MICHAEL S BERKOWITZ

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more