Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fairfield County

Court

Fairfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-10
Type T 29 Torts Malpractice Legal
Docket 87 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Peter Claus Landi
Defendant Susan Kohn Esq|Edward J. Raymond|Eileen W. Raymond|Non Appearing|Suresh Rajan|Sarah Elizabeth Rajan|Jennifer Rosen

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. NOTICE Service of Interrogatories/Production Requests on Defendant
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD
  7. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  8. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  9. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  10. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  11. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  12. OFFER OF COMPROMISE
  13. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 1/16/2024 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  14. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/16/2024 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  15. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Limited Objections
  16. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  17. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Kebalo
  18. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Rizzo
  19. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Court Trial RESULT: Order 5/28/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  20. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Kebalo
  21. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Rizzo
  22. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Court Trial RESULT: Order 5/28/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  23. RDER RESULT: Order 5/28/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  24. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Piecuch
  25. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  26. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Michael J. Parsell
  27. OTION IN LIMINE Preclusion of late-disclosed communications
  28. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Parsell - Cross Disclosure
  29. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 12/11/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  30. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/11/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  31. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Pretrial - 12/19/24
  32. EQUEST TO BRING AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURTHOUSE (JD-CL-90) Court Trial - 1/14/25 and 1/15/25 RESULT: Granted 1/7/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  33. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/7/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  34. IST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a) Court Trial - 1/14/25 and 1/15/25
  35. OTION TO CITE ADDITIONAL PARTY and amend complaint RESULT: Denied 2/3/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  36. RDER RESULT: Denied 2/3/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  37. OTION TO CITE ADDITIONAL PARTY And Amend Complaint RESULT: Granted 2/24/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  38. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/24/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  39. ETURN OF SERVICE Amended Complaint and Cite Additional Parties
  40. MENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS
  41. MENDED COMPLAINT AS SERVED
  42. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Status Conference re Trial
  43. OTION TO TRANSFER Motion Transfer or, in alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Order 4/21/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  44. EMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION RESULT: Off 4/21/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  45. ERTIFICATION OF SERVICE Corrected Certification for Motion to Transfer or, in alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment
  46. EQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128) Entry 130.00 April 21st short calendar
  47. RDER RESULT: Denied 4/21/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  48. FFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket No. 130
  49. OUNTERCLAIM Complaint for a Declaratory Judgment
  50. EQUEST TO REVISE Amended Complaint # 128.00
  51. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE (Doc. 135.00)
  52. RDER RESULT: Overruled 5/12/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  53. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  54. EQUEST TO REVISE
  55. BJECTION to Counterclaim
  56. EPLY to Plaintiff's Obj. to Suresh Rajan and Sarah Rajan's Request to Revise
  57. EVISED COMPLAINT
  58. EPLY Reply to Objection to Counterclaim/Complaint for Declaratory Judgment
  59. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 6/2/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  60. RDER RESULT: Sustained 6/2/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  61. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Co-Defendant's Complaint for Declaratory Judgment RESULT: Granted 6/9/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  62. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/9/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  63. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 6/9/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  64. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/9/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  65. EPLY Reply to Objection to Request to Revise (#143.00)
  66. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Co-Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Granted 6/16/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  67. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/16/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  68. RDER RESULT: Order 5/27/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH
  69. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Co-Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Granted 6/16/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  70. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/16/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  71. OTION TO STRIKE Counts 5 and 6
  72. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to strike Counts 5 and 6
  73. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REVISED COMPLAINT RESULT: Granted 6/23/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  74. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/23/2025 HON KENNETH POVODATOR
  75. CHEDULING ORDER Proposed Scheduling Order on Consent RESULT: Order 6/13/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH
  76. RDER RESULT: Order 6/13/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH
  77. BJECTION TO MOTION to Strike (Doc. 150.00)
  78. EPLY MEMORANDUM to Objection #154.00
  79. OTICE NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF NON-STANDARD INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  80. OTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF NON-STANDARD INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION ON CO-DEFENDANT
  81. OTICE OF SERVICE OF NON-STANDARD INTERROGATORIES & REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO CO-DEFENDANTS
  82. OTICE of Service of Nonstandard Interrogatories and Requests for Production onto Co-Defendant E. Raymond
  83. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION In support of Entry No. 137, Motion for Summary Judgment
  84. OTICE of Service of Standard Interrogatories and Requests for Production on Co-Defendant E. Raymond
  85. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Notice of Service of Non-Standard Interrogatories and Requests for Production (Entry #159)
  86. OTION TO STRIKE Seventh Count of the Revised Complaint
  87. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Strike Seventh Count of the Revised Complaint

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more