Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Monroe Co

Court

Monroe Co

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-02
Status Pending
Type Libel/slander
Docket 9 entries
Disposition SETTLEMENT

Parties

Plaintiff Caren M. Brinson | Camfl | Cartrfa | Cartrfa | Cartrfp | Cartrfp | Canosati | | Motion For Leave Comments: 's Motion For Leave To Amend The Complaint To Assert Punitive Damages (e) | Response To Request For Admissions Comments: Defendant, Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Response To S request For Admissions [e] | Response To Request For Admissions Comments: Defendant, Magda Marcelo Robainas Response To S request For Admissions [e] | Response To Request For Production Comments: Defendant, Magda Marcelo Robainas Response To S First Request For Production [e] | Response To Request For Production Comments: Defendant, Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Response To S First Request For Production [e] | Notice Of Serving Answers To Interrogatories Comments: Defendant, Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Notice Of Serving Answer To S Interrogatories [e] | Notice Of Serving Answers To Interrogatories Comments: Defendant, Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Notice Of Serving Answer To S Interrogatories [e] | Motion For E
Defendant Odelmys Bello | Magda Marcelo Robaina | Marcelo Law Group, P.a. | Cartrfa | Cartrfa | Cartrfp | Cartrfp | Canosati | | | | Response To Request For Admissions Comments: , Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Response To Plaintiffs request For Admissions [e] | Response To Request For Admissions Comments: , Magda Marcelo Robainas Response To Plaintiffs request For Admissions [e] | Response To Request For Production Comments: , Magda Marcelo Robainas Response To Plaintiffs First Request For Production [e] | Response To Request For Production Comments: , Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Response To Plaintiffs First Request For Production [e] | Notice Of Serving Answers To Interrogatories Comments: , Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Notice Of Serving Answer To Plaintiffs Interrogatories [e] | Notice Of Serving Answers To Interrogatories Comments: , Marcelo Law Group, P.a.s Notice Of Serving Answer To Plaintiffs Interrogatories [e] | Reply Comments: To Affirmative Defenses Asserted By , Odelmys Bello (e
Photo of Hon. Garcia Luis

Judge

Hon. Garcia Luis

Monroe County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Notice Of Taking Deposition * Comments: (e)
  2. Notice Of Mediation Conference Comments: Re-Notice of (e)
  3. Motion for Leave Comments: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO ASSERT PUNITIVE DAMAGES (e)
  4. Request For Copies Comments: (e)
  5. Notice of Serving Proposal for Settlement Comments: NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSAL OF SETTLEMENT UPON SUPERIOR EXOTICS TEAM, LLC [E]
  6. Response to Request for Admissions Comments: DEFENDANT, MARCELO LAW GROUP, P.A.S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS [E]
  7. Response to Request for Admissions Comments: DEFENDANT, MAGDA MARCELO-ROBAINAS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS [E]
  8. Response to Request for Production Comments: DEFENDANT, MAGDA MARCELO-ROBAINAS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION [E]
  9. Response to Request for Production Comments: DEFENDANT, MARCELO LAW GROUP, P.A.S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION [E]

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more