Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- ASE FILED
- OURT COST ASSESSED MARIO D. BLUE BILL AMOUNT 194.51 PAID AMOUNT 0 AMOUNT DUE 194.51
- PPELLANT'S 9112985 RECORD TRANSMITTED TO THE COURT OF APPEALS CONSISTING OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DOCKET, JOURNAL ENTRIES AND THE ORIGINAL PAPERS ON CA NO. 112985.
- ------------------- NOTICE OF APPEAL -------------------- CA NO. 112985 NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PLTF. APPELLANT W/A 9A PRAECIPE AND DOCKETING STATEMENT ON THE REGULAR CALENDAR.
- OTICE OF APPEAL FILED
- UDGMENT ENTRY(51127128) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MARIO D. BLUE 4212 EAST 186TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44122-0000
- UDGMENT ENTRY(51127127) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALEXANDER WALTON PRUNKA [email protected]
- UDGMENT ENTRY(51127126) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ALEXANDER WALTON PRUNKA [email protected]
- PON FILING HIS PRO SE COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER IN THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PLAINTIFF SUBMITTED A FEE-WAIVER AFFIDAVIT. A HEARING WAS CONDUCTED ON JUNE 6, 2023, AS TO PLAINTIFF'S STATUS AS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT. AT THE HEARING, THE COURT TOOK NOTICE OF FILINGS PLAINTIFF HAD MADE IN OTHER COURT PROCEEDINGS THAT CALLED INTO QUESTION HIS INCOME AND ASSETS. PLAINTIFF REFUSED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE COURT REGARDING HIS STATUS AS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT. THIS COURT'S JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUNE 13, 2023, DETERMINED THAT PLAINTIFF FAILED TO QUALIFY AS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT DUE TO HIS REFUSAL TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND GRANTED PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER TO MAKE THE DEPOSIT OR SECURITY REQUIRED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS FOR THE FILING OF THIS ACTION. THE COURT FURTHER STATED THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WOULD RESULT IN DISMISSAL. PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO MAKE THE DEPOSIT OR SECURITY REQUIRED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS AND HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER OF THIS COURT. THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COSTS TO PLAINTIFF. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- LAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION . PRO SE (9999999)
- RIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY D1 EXPERIAN, NCAC. ALEXANDER WALTON PRUNKA 0100431 EXPERIAN'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- LAINTIFF OBJECT TO JOURNAL ENTRY. PRO SE (9999999)
- PON FILING HIS PRO SE COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER IN THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PLAINTIFF SUBMITTED A FEE-WAIVER AFFIDAVIT. A HEARING WAS CONDUCTED ON JUNE 6, 2023, AS TO PLAINTIFF'S STATUS AS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT. AT HEARING, PLAINTIFF REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS REGARDING HIS STATUS AS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT. THE COURT DENIED THE WAIVER OF FEES AND DISMISSED THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ON JUNE 8, 2023, PLAINTIFF FILED AN OBJECTION TO THE DISMISSAL, ARGUING THE COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING THE CASE. THE COURT HEREBY CONSTRUES PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION AS A CIV.R. 60(B) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, AND FINDS SAID MOTION WELL-TAKEN. THE COURT HEREBY VACATES ITS DISMISSAL OF THIS MATTER PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 60(B). THE COURT CONTINUES TO FIND, HOWEVER, THAT PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO QUALIFY AS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT. THE CLERK OF COURTS SHALL RETAIN THE FILING OF THIS ACTION AND PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO MAKE THE DEPOSIT OR SECURITY REQUIRED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS FOR THE FILING OF THIS ACTION. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
- NSWER FILED BY D1 EXPERIAN, NCAC. ATTORNEY ALEXANDER WALTON PRUNKA 0100431 EXPERIAN'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES
- LAINTIFF OBJECT TO DISMISSAL
- OURT REPORTER FEE
- OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D1 EXPERIAN, NCAC. ALEXANDER WALTON PRUNKA 0100431. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
- LAINTIFF ENTERS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 07/29/2023 - UNKNOWN
- LAINTIFF ENTERS AFFIDAVIT IN RESPONSE TO HEARING . PRO SE (9999999)
- EARING SET FOR 06/06/2023 AT 01:30 PM. HEARING SET FOR 06/06/2023 AT 01:30 PM, COURTROOM 19-D, JUDGE DANIEL GAUL. A HEARING ON APPLICANT'S FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE/FEE-WAIVER AFFIDAVIT IS HEARBY SET FOR JUNE 6, 2023, AT 1:30 PM. APPLICANT SHALL APPEAR AND PROVIDE COPIES OF: (1) TAX RETURNS FOR THE LAST 7 YEARS; (2) PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY REAL ESTATE, AUTOMOBILES OR OTHER VEHICLES; (3) EVIDENCE OF CASH IN CHECKING, SAVINGS, OR OTHER FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS; (4) PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF STOCKS, BONDS, AND ANY OTHER LIQUID ASSETS. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
- SPS RECEIPT NO. 50517144 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/06/2023 EXPERIAN, NCAC. PROCESSED BY COC 05/10/2023.
- UMS COMPLAINT(50517144) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: EXPERIAN, NCAC. P.O. BOX 9701 ALLEN, TX 75013-0000
- RIT FEE
- OMPLAINT FILED. SERVICE REQUEST - SUMMONS BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE DEFENDANT(S).
- UDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- EGAL RESEARCH
- EGAL AID
- OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- OMPUTER FEE
- LERK'S FEE
- EGAL NEWS
- FFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY, FILED
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In