Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Washington Unified County

Court

Washington Unified County

Washington

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-25
Status Completed/Re-Completed
Type Adl Criminal Adult
Docket 156 entries

Parties

Plaintiff (criminal) of Washington
Defendant (wip) worden, Dean J W
Photo of Hon. Warning Stephen M

Judge

Hon. Warning Stephen M

Cowlitz County (WA)

Washington

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  6. 08/24/2022
  7. 08/25/2022
  10. 09/01/2022
  12. 09/20/2022
  15. 10/18/2022
  25. 11/23/2022
  28. 11/30/2022
  40. 03/10/2023
  43. 03/23/2023
  51. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  52. Cancel Reason Stricken-Not Confirmed
  53. Readiness Hearing
  54. Original Type Readiness Hearing
  55. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  56. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  57. Result Held
  58. Comment **2ND TRIAL SETTING**
  59. Motion Hearing
  60. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  61. Comment Ct sets trial on December 1, 2022 at 8:30
  62. Guilty Plea and Sentencing
  63. Original Type Guilty Plea and Sentencing
  64. Judicial Officer Warning, Stephen M
  65. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  66. Result Held
  67. Comment -Per OPD & Approved by Judge Fassett
  68. Guilty Plea and Sentencing Hearing
  69. Comment Ct strikes jury trial
  70. Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty
  71. Judicial Officer Warning, Stephen M
  72. Case Resolution Guilty Plea Before Trial Commencement
  73. Presentation of Order
  74. Original Type Presentation of Order
  75. Judicial Officer Bashor, Gary
  76. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  77. Result Failure to Appear
  78. Motion Hearing
  79. Judicial Officer Bashor, Gary
  80. Comment Deft not present; Ct issues bench warrant - No Bail
  81. Bench Warrant Issued Copy Filed
  82. Jury Trial-12
  83. Judicial Officer Fassett, Patricia M
  84. Hearing Time 08:46 AM
  85. Cancel Reason Plea Entered
  86. Quash Warrant
  87. Original Type Quash Warrant
  88. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  89. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  90. Result Failure to Appear
  91. Comment -Per OPD **FTA @ Signing J&S**
  92. Hearing Continued Defense Respondent Requested
  93. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  94. Motion Hearing
  95. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  96. Comment Warrant remains
  97. Quash Warrant
  98. Original Type Quash Warrant
  99. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  100. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  101. Result Held
  102. Comment **FTA Signing of J&S**
  103. Motion Hearing
  104. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  105. Comment CT MAINTAINS WARRANT
  106. Presentation of Order
  107. Original Type Presentation of Order
  108. Judicial Officer Haan, Marilyn K
  109. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  110. Result Failure to Appear
  111. Comment SIGN J&S
  112. Hearing Stricken In Court NonAppearance
  113. Judicial Officer Haan, Marilyn K
  114. Motion Hearing
  115. Judicial Officer Haan, Marilyn K
  116. Comment Warrant remains
  117. Motion
  118. Comment for Limited Admission Pursuant to APR 8(b)
  119. Order Granting Motion Petition
  120. Judicial Officer Fassett, Patricia M
  121. Comment for Limited Admission Pursuant to APR 8(b)
  122. Notice of Substitution of Counsel
  123. Return on Warrant
  124. Original Type Return on Warrant
  125. Judicial Officer Haan, Marilyn K
  126. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  127. Result Held
  128. Comment **FTA @ Presentation of Order - Sign J&S**
  129. Motion Hearing
  130. Judicial Officer Haan, Marilyn K
  131. Comment Deft held without bail
  132. Sheriffs Return on a Bench Warrant
  133. Presentation of Order
  134. Original Type Presentation of Order
  135. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  136. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  137. Result Continued
  138. Comment **Sign J&S or be resentenced**
  139. Hearing Continued Stipulated
  140. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  141. Motion Hearing
  142. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  143. Resentencing Hearing
  144. Original Type Resentencing Hearing
  145. Judicial Officer Evans, Michael H
  146. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  147. Result Held
  148. Comment and Sign J&S
  149. Sentencing Hearing
  150. Judicial Officer Evans, Michael H
  151. Comment Deft re-sentenced; J&S signed
  152. Report
  153. Comment General Scoring Form
  154. Felony Judgment and Sentence
  155. Judicial Officer Evans, Michael H
  156. Instructions

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more