Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-01
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant James A. Leeson
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(52897418) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JAMES A. LEESON 10416 LINNET AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(52897417) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(52897416) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  5. HIS COURT'S ORDER OF 12/14/2023 PROVIDED PLAINTIFF NOTICE THAT SERVICE WAS TO BE PERFECTED BY 1/19/2024 OR THE CASE WOULD BE DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO SERVE THE DEFENDANT. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. URSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), FAILURE TO COMPLETE SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SERVICE SHALL BE PERFECTED BY 1/19/2024 OR THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. UYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT SERVICE FEE $40.00
  8. 52121434 THE WITHIN NAMED LEESON/JAMES/A. 11/13/2023 SHERIFF DEPUTY SERV. FAILURE OF SERVICE..
  9. SHERIFF SERVICE PACKET: JAMES A. LEESON 10416 LINNET AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  10. SUMS COMPLAINT(52121434) SENT BY CUYAHOGA SHERIFF SERVICE. TO: JAMES A. LEESON 10416 LINNET AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  11. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  12. WRIT FEE
  13. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY PERSONAL SERVICE (SHERIFF)
  14. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 51059801 ADDRESSED TO JAMES A. LEESON(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(51059801) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAMES A. LEESON 10416 LINNET AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. WRIT FEE
  18. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE
  19. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 50533776 ADDRESSED TO JAMES A. LEESON(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(50533776) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAMES A. LEESON 10416 LINNET AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44111
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. JUDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  24. LEGAL RESEARCH
  25. LEGAL NEWS
  26. LEGAL AID
  27. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  28. COMPUTER FEE
  29. CLERK'S FEE
  30. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RYAN S. BUNDY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more