Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- iling In Re Petition for Court Order Permitting Disclosure of Confidential Records Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5.31D.; Exhibit A; Exhibit B; Exhibit C; Exhibit D; Exhibit E; Exhibit F; Exhibit G. Filed By: BRITTON LAURENCE ST ONGE On Behalf Of: BRUCE TALEN, COMMERCE BANK
- ase Disposed- By Order ORDER ISSUED: THE PETITION FOR COURT ORDER PERMITTING DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 5.31(D) IS SUSTAINED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL (OCDC) IS ORDERED TO DISCLOSE TO PETITIONERS ALL RECORDS IDENTIFIED AS SETS A AND B IN ITS RESPONSE TO THE PETITION. SUCH RECORDS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING PROTECTIVE ORDER: RECORDS IN SETS A AND B THAT ARE NOT OTHERWISE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND CANNOT BE USED OR DISCLOSED BY THE PARTIES OR THEIR COUNSEL FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO PREPARE FOR AND CONDUCT THE PROCEEDINGS IN CASE NO. 20SL-CC03379, EISENSTEIN V. COMMERCE BANK, ET AL. THE PETITION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT PETITIONER REQUESTS DISCLOSURE OF THE RECORDS IDENTIFIED IN SETS C AND D. OCDC'S MOTION FOR A CONCOMITANT ORDER LIMITING TESTIMONY FROM CURRENT AND FORMER OCDC STAFF IS OVERRULED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
- iling Joel Eisensteins Response to Commerce Banks Petition for Court Order Permitting Disclosure of Confidential Records; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: DANIEL L GOLDBERG
- iling Response of Bruntrager Billings, P.C. to Petition for Order Permitting Disclosure of Confidential Records Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: NEIL JOHN BRUNTRAGER
- iling Response of Mandel and Mandel LLP to Petition for Order Permitting Disclosure of Confidential Records Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ALAN SCOTT MANDEL
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- iling RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INSPECT; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SAM SCOTT PHILLIPS
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- ourt Order Issued ORDER ISSUED: OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, DANIEL L. GOLDBERG, ALAN SCOTT MANDEL, AND NEIL JOHN BRUNTRAGER ARE REQUESTED TO FILE SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 3, 2022.
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- iling Fee Paid Filed By: BRITTON LAURENCE ST ONGE On Behalf Of: BRUCE TALEN, COMMERCE BANK
- iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: BRITTON LAURENCE ST ONGE
- ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: BRITTON LAURENCE ST ONGE
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In